About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

31 Cornell J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 65 (2021-2022)
A Public Service Role for Digital Libraries: A Case of Emergency Electronic Access to Library Material and the Unequal Battle against Misinformation through Copyright Law Reform

handle is hein.journals/cjlpp31 and id is 69 raw text is: 






      A   PUBLIC SERVICE ROLE FOR DIGITAL
        LIBRARIES: A CASE OF EMERGENCY
 ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO LIBRARY MATERIAL
       AND THE UNEQUAL BATTLE AGAINST
              MISINFORMATION THROUGH
                COPYRIGHT LAW REFORM


                           Argyri Panezi*


     This Article analyzes the role of copyright doctrine and case law in
preserving the institutional function of libraries-both on- and offline-
as trusted and, in principle, neutral hubs equalizing access to credible
information and  knowledge  in societies with structural inequalities. In
doing so it examines the ongoing Hachette v. Internet Archive litigation
before the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York in the
context of earlier copyright cases, finding that there is a persistent need
for electronic access to library material online.
     Libraries have traditionally served an important role as reserved
spaces for legally permissible distribution of books outside of markets.
Copyright  law, however, has the potential to hinder the fuction of librar-
ies and other cultural heritage institutions particularly in equalizing ac-
cess to knowledge. While there exist some exceptions and limitations that
partially alleviate this, their applicability in the digital environment is
still contested. Two novel challenges are interfering: first, an unmet and
contentious need for emergency  access to electronic library material to
be  granted online, and second, the need to counteract historical biases
and  misinformation, both of which multiply when spread within a hyper-
connected  and digitized society. In order to ensure electronic access to
credible information and  knowledge, policymakers  must  address these
challenges  strategically and reassess the needs of subjects and institu-
tions that are currently subject to copyright exceptions.

     * Assistant Professor, IE Law School, IE University & Research Fellow, Digital Civil
 Society Lab at Stanford PACS. I owe thanks to Lucy Bernholz, Toussaint Nothias, Melissa
 Levine, and Maria Panezi for their insightful comments and the many discussions, and to all
 my colleagues at the Digital Civil Society Lab and at the Stanford Center on Philanthropy and
 Civil Society (PACS) who commented on an earlier version of the Article at the Stanford
 PACS Seminar. I also owe thanks to Pamela Samuelson, Giovanni Sartor, Giorgio Monti,
 Lionel Bently, Jason Schultz, and James Grimmelmann for earlier constructive comments in
 various stages during my doctoral dissertation which informs Chapters III and IV of this
 Article.


65

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most