About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

131 L. Q. Rev. 476 (2015)
The New Tort of Passing off

handle is hein.journals/lqr131 and id is 476 raw text is: 








                  THE NEW TORT OF PASSING OFF

Phillip  Johnson
Professor   of Commercial Law, Cardiff University

Johanna Gibson
Herchel   Smith   Professor   of Intellectual  Property   Law,   Queen   Mary,
University   of London

The  Unfair  Commercial Practices Directive (2005/29), or UCPD, represents a
fundamental   shift in consumer protection  law both at the European  level and within
the individual  Member States.' In relation to the UK, when the Directive was
implemented as   the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008,
it was described  as the biggest  shake-up  in consumer   law  for over 40  years.' We
suggest, however,   that its reach goes far beyond  consumer   law and  that it also has
implications  in relation  to domestic  unfair  competition  law:  that is, the law  of
passing  off.4 This observation  is also made   in a context  where  certain  scholars,
following  decisions  of the Court of Justice,' have suggested the law  of trade marks
is infiltrating and influencing the domestic   law of unfair  competition.' However,
we  say that it is not trade mark law, but rather, the harmonised consumer  protection
law  that has most  significantly affected the law of passing  off.'
   The  traditional law  of passing  off (that is, the law as it existed prior to the
UCPD) is well established. There are three basic elements (the classic trinity)
according   to the notorious  Jif Lemon  case:  goodwill  in a mark   or the get-up  of
goods;  a misrepresentation  leading the public  to believe the goods supplied  by one
trader are those of another; and  damage   caused  by reason  of the erroneous belief.'
In this discussion  we  will consider the extent  to which  these elements  may   have
evolved,  or indeed  require  refining, in order for the  UK  to comply   with  its EU


   As to previous attempts to harmonise unfair competition law across Europe see C. Wadlow, Unfair Competition
in Community Law: Part 1: the Age of the 'Classical Model' [2006] E.I.P.R. 433 and C. Wadlow, Unfair Competition
in Community Law: Part 2: Harmonisation Becomes Gridlock [2006] E.I.P.R. 469; also see F. Beier, The Law of
Unfair Competition in the European Community: Its Development and Present Status [1985] E.I.P.R. 284 (also see
an extended version at (1985) 16 I.I.C. 139).
  2 Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277).
  3 J. Smith and R. Montagnon, The New Consumer and Business Protection Regulations: Another String to the
Brand Owner's Bow? (2009) 4 J.I.P.L.P. 33 at 33.
  4 Sir Richard Arnold has argued that the UK now has an unfair competition law made up of many different elements
one being Directive 2005/29 another being passing off: Arnold, English Unfair Competition Law [2013] I.I.C. 63.
  5 In particular L'Oreal SA v Bellure NV (C-487/07) [2009] E.C.R 1-5185; [2010] All E.R. (EC) 28; Martin YPaz
Difusion SA v Depuydt (C-661/11) [2014] E.T.M.R 6; [2014] Bus. L.R. 329.
   See, for example, A. Kur, Trade Marks Functions, Don't They? CJEU Jurisprudence and Unfair Competition
Practices [2014] I.I.C. 434 at 447 et seq.; and G. Dinwoodie, Dilution as Unfair Competition: European Echoes
in R.C. Dreyfuss and J. Ginsburg (eds), Intellectual Property at the Edge: The Contested Contours oflP (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2014), at p.90 et seq.
  7The question of whether domestic unfair competition laws are pre-empted by Directive 2005/29 was postulated
(but not considered) by A. Ohly, Interfaces Between Trade Mark Protection and Unfair Competition: Confusion
about Confusion and Misconceptions about Misappropriation? in N. Lee et al. (eds), Intellectual Property, Unfair
Competition and Publicity: Convergences and Development (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014), at p.33 and, in
particular, at p.58.
  8Reckitt & Coleman Products Ltd v Borden Inc (No.3) [1990] 1 W.L.R. 491 at 499; [1990] 1 All E.R. 873 HL at
880 (JzfLemon Case); also see the five elements identified by Lord Diplock in Erven Warnink BV v J Townend &
Sons (Hull) Ltd (No.1) [1979] A.C. 731 at 742; [1979] 2 All E.R. 927 at 932-933.

476     (2015) 131 L.Q.R. July C 2015 Thomson Reuters (Professional) UK Limited and Contributors

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most