About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

70 Dep't of Just. J. Fed. L. & Prac. 105 (2022)
Toward a Safety Valve for Sharing Documents Obtained by Grand Jury Subpoena in Parallel Investigations

handle is hein.journals/usab70 and id is 818 raw text is: Toward a Safety Valve for Sharing
Documents Obtained by Grand
Jury Subpoena in Parallel
Investigations
Paul W. Kaufman1
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure can have a
profound impact on parallel fraud investigations. The best way to
address these issues is to avoid them entirely through considered,
cooperative use of other mechanisms for obtaining information like
agency Office of Inspector General (OIG) subpoenas, Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) subpoenas, or civil
investigative demands. By holding off on grand jury processes as long
as possible, investigators can proceed in parallel investigations
without concern for grand jury secrecy. In some cases, using other
tools is not possible. In others, the civil issues may emerge
mid-investigation, after a grand jury subpoena has already been used
to obtain documents.
The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Sells Engineering,
Inc.2 significantly limits parallel investigations once grand jury
testimony begins. Sells Engineering, however, does not preclude
cooperation between the Department of Justice's (Department) Civil
and Criminal Divisions (referred to as civil and criminal, respectively,
going forward) in all cases where grand jury subpoenas have obtained
documents. In some cases, the civil and criminal Assistant U.S.
Attorneys (AUSAs)3 can effectively cooperate and exchange
information, even if documents have already been obtained by grand
jury subpoena. But to maximize the opportunities for cooperation in
some cases, critical documents obtained by grand jury subpoena
1 The author gratefully acknowledges the contributions to this article of
former USAO extern Timothy Cordova, former colleagues Margaret L.
Hutchinson and Michael Levy, incomparable current colleagues Veronica
Finkelstein and Anthony Scicchitano, and supervisors Charlene Keller
Fullmer and Gregory David.
2 463 U.S. 418, 427 (1983).
a This article refers to AUSAs by their function in a particular case.

DOJ Journal of Federal Law and Practice

August 2022

105

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most