About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

9 Probs. Communism 1 (1960)
Pattern and Limits of the Sino-Soviet Dispute

handle is hein.journals/probscmu9 and id is 275 raw text is: 


CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS


Pattern and Limits



of the Sino-Soviet Dispute


                                                                          By Zbigniew Brzezinski


                  EDITORS' NOTE: The May-June 1960 issue of this journal carried the widely-discussed article
                  by Donald S. Zagoria, 'Strains in the Sino-Soviet Alliance, which offered a thorough and detailed
                  exposition of the various issues and tensions which have arisen between the two major Communist
                  powers within the past few years. In the article below, Professor Brzezinski's aim is not so much
                  to amplify this discussion in terms of actual developments, but rather to offer an explanation of
                  why some of these differences have emerged, and why they must, given the present relationship
                  between Moscow and Peking, remain frozen at a certain point. In delineating both the causes
                  and the limits of the current conflict, he places it in a more meaningful historical, ideological
                  and political perspective.


THERE CAN NO LONGER BE any doubt that in
the course of recent months a significant and sharp dis-
agreement has developed between Moscow and Peking.
The essence of the argument concerns the question of
methods to be used by the Communist camp in its strug-
gle for a world-wide victory. More specifically, the
following issues have generated particular heat: 1) the
problem of war in the period prior to a complete Com-
munist victory; 2) the matter of peaceful coexistence and
the related problems of how to; capitalize on the anti-
colonial struggle; 3) the issue of disarmament and the
sharing of nuclear weapons; 1 4) the stages of the
In a militant speech Liu Chang-sheng, vice-president of the
Chinese trade unions, has hinted strongly that only by sharing its
nuclear weapons with the other Communist states can the Soviet
Union exert pressure on the West to accept a nuclear ban: We
hold that the utmost efforts must be made to reach agreements

A frequent contributor to this journal, Mr. Brzezinski
was recently appointed Associate Professor of Public Law
and Government at the Russian Institute, Columbia Uni-
versity, New York. His latest book, The Soviet Bloc-
Unity and Conflict (Harvard University Press, 1960)
was reviewed in the July-August issue of this journal.


domestic construction of communism.2 The Sino-Soviet
dialogue evokes echoes of the violent disagreement in
1909 within the Bolshevik movement between Lenin
and A. A. Bogdanov and his supporters. The latter
rejected the view that a phase of organic development
was transitionally at hand, and they charged Lenin and
his group with drifting in the Menshevik direction, with
abandoning the revolutionary struggle which, according
to the Bogdanovites, was more essential . . . than ever
before.
  The very existence of Sino-Soviet differences has far-
reaching implications for the future of the Communist

on the banning of nuclear weapons and to prevent the outbreak
of a nuclear war in the world. Soviet mastery of nuclear weap-
ons has not deprived US imperialism of its monopoly of such
weapons. The Soviet Union and the other socialist countries
should continue to develop their lead in the sphere of atomic
energy and, at the same time, the people throughout the world
should wage a more extensive struggle against imperialism and
against nuclear weapons. Only in these circumstances can such
agreement be reached. (Radio Peking, June 8, 1960.)
2 The reader will find an able recapitulation and analysis of
these issues in D. Zagoria, Strains in the Sino-Soviet Alliance,
Problems of Communism. May-June 1960.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most