About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

125 Yale L. J. 2292 (2015-2016)
Foundling Fathers: (Non-) Marriage and Parental Rights in the Age of Equality

handle is hein.journals/ylr125 and id is 2358 raw text is: SERENA MAYERI
Foundling Fathers: (Non-)Marriage and Parental
Rights in the Age of Equality
ABSTRACT. The twentieth-century equality revolution established the principle of sex neutrality
in the law of marriage and divorce and eased the most severe legal disabilities traditionally imposed
upon nonmarital children. Formal equality under the law eluded nonmarital parents, however.
Although unwed fathers won unprecedented legal rights and recognition in a series of Supreme Court
cases decided in the 1970s and 1980s, they failed to achieve constitutional parity with mothers or with
married and divorced fathers. This Article excavates nonmarital fathers' quest for equal rights, until
now a mere footnote in the history of constitutional equality law.
Unmarried fathers lacked a social movement of their own, but various groups and interests
fought for their own causes on the battleground of nonmarital parenthood. Nonmarital fathers' claims
posed a particular dilemma for feminists, who promoted gender-egalitarian parenting within marriage
but struggled over the implications of unmarried fathers' rights for women's autonomy and for
substantive sex equality. The Justices' deliberations, in contrast, focused on the rights of men and on
ensuring the smooth functioning of adoption procedures. The Court largely avoided the feminist
dilemma, instead framing cases as disputes between husbands and unwed fathers. Denying
nonmarital fathers' request to be treated as de facto divorced fathers, the Court reaffirmed the legal
supremacy of marital families.
The Court's failure to engage difficult questions about substantive sex equality reverberated
beyond the parental rights cases to leave its mark on the twenty-first century jurisprudence of
citizenship. As nonmarital parenthood becomes the American norm, recovering its constitutional
history illuminates how and why marital status still delimits the boundaries of equality law.
AUTHOR. Professor of Law and History, University of Pennsylvania Law School. I am grateful to
Regina Austin, Kristin Collins, Deborah Dinner, Katie Eyer, Smita Ghosh, Sarah Barringer Gordon,
Martin Guggenheim, Clare Huntington, Genevieve Lakier, Sophia Z. Lee, Robin Lenhardt, Kevin
Noble Maillard, Solangel Maldonado, Terry Maroney, Mary X. Mitchell, Melissa Murray, Douglas
NeJaime, Allison Kirkpatrick Powers, Dorothy Roberts, Daniel Sharfstein, Jed Shugerman, Reva
Siegel, Justin Simard, Edward Stein, Sarah Swan, Allison Tait, Mark Tushnet, and Adnan Zulfiqar for
generous comments and conversations about earlier versions of this project. Participants in workshops
and conferences at Fordham University, the University of Pennsylvania, Vanderbilt, Queens
University, New York Area Family Law Scholars, and annual meetings of the Law and Society
Association and the American Society for Legal History also provided valuable feedback. Smita Ghosh
contributed superb research assistance. For help gathering sources, thanks are due to Alvin Dong,
Edwin Greenlee, and the staff of the Biddle Law Library at the University of Pennsylvania Law School;
John Jacob of the Powell Archives at Washington & Lee University School of Law; Patrick Kerwin of
the Library of Congress; Meagan Buckley; Zachary Frazier; Emily Prifogle; Sennett Rockers; and
Thomas Wheeler. Finally, my thanks to Lucas Croslow and the editors of the Yale Law Journal for
thoughtful editorial assistance.

2292

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most