About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

51 Stan. L. Rev. 1477 (1998-1999)
An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence

handle is hein.journals/stflr51 and id is 1489 raw text is: ARTICLES
An Economic Approach to
the Law of Evidence
Richard A. Posner*
In this article, Judge Richard A. Posner presents the first comprehensive
economic analysis of the law of evidence. The article is presented in three
parts. First, Judge Posner proposes and describes two possible economic mod-
els, both a search and a cost-minimization approach, to describe how evidence
is obtained, presented, and evaluated. In both, he incorporates Bayes' theorem
to examine rational decisionmaking. Second, he examines the evidence-
gathering process, comparing and contrasting, in economic terms, the in-
quisitorial and adversarial systems ofjustice. The inquisitorial system, at
first glance, appears to be more economically efficient. This, though, may be
illusory, a result of the adversarial system's greater public visibility and wide-
spread acceptance ofplea bargaining. Finally, the article addresses burden of
proof issues, plus specific provisions of the Federal Rules of Evidence: harm-
less error, limiting instructions, relevance, character evidence, hearsay, expert
witnesses, and various privileges and exclusionary rules. He concludes that
American evidence law, rather than simply sacrificing efficiency in order to
protect noneconomic values, is actually quite efficient and possibly superior to
its Continental, inquisitorial counterparts; but a number of reforms are sug-
gested.
The law of evidence is the body of rules that determines what, and how,
information may be provided to a legal tribunal that must resolve a factual
dispute. The importance of the accurate resolution of such disputes to an
economically efficient system of law has been discussed at length,1 but the
* Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; Senior Lecturer, University of
Chicago Law School. I thank Elizabeth Beetz, Susan Burgess, Brian Bufler, Dimitri Karcazes,
Anup Malani, Kenneth Murphy, and Andrew Swartz for excellent research assistance; Ronald Al-
len, Gary Becker, Andrew Daughety, Gertrud Fremling, Bruce Kobayashi, Richard Lempert, Erzo
Luttmer, Eric Posner, Jennifer Reinganum, Michael Saks, Suzanne Scotchmer, Steven Shavell,
Stephen Stigler, Cass Sunstein, and participants in the University of Chicago's Seminar on Rational
Models in the Social Sciences for many very helpful comments on a previous draft; and Tomas
Philipson and Sherwin Rosen for enlightening conversations on the subject matter of the article.
1. See, e.g., Louis Kaplow, Accuracy in Adjudication, in I THE NEW PALGRAVE DICTIONARY
OF ECONOMICS AND THE LAW 1 (Peter Newman ed., 1998); Louis Kaplow, The Value of Accuracy
in Adjudication: An Economic Analysis, 23 J. LEGAL STUD. 307 (1994); Richard A. Posner, An

1477

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most