About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

84 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1455 (2016)
Welcome to the Working Week: The Minimum Pleading Standard for Unpaid Overtime Claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

handle is hein.journals/ucinlr84 and id is 1479 raw text is: 




     WELCOME TO THE WORKING WEEK: THE MINIMUM
     PLEADING   STANDARD FOR UNPAID OVERTIME CLAIMS
     UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938

                           JeradT   Whitt*

                           I. INTRODUCTION

   Since its passage in 1938, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) has
been used  to enforce and maintain minimum   standards for workers in
the United States. The FLSA  established, among other things, a federal
minimum wage, child labor restrictions, workweek restrictions,
recordkeeping requirements, and requirements for overtime pay.1 While
the FLSA  has  been amended  many   times since 1938, its amendments
have  mostly dealt with  minimum   wage  increases and  expansion  of
coverage  to  new   classifications of employees.2  In  contrast, the
composition of the American job market has changed  dramatically from
the dominance  of manual  labor and manufacturing in the 1930s to the
technology driven modem   workplace. This shift can make application of
the FLSA  confusing and difficult for today's employees and employers,
leading to an increase in the number of FLSA cases in recent years.3
   One particularly confounding issue with modem application   of the
FLSA  involves the minimum  pleading standard for allegations of unpaid
overtime.  Historically, the minimum   pleading  requirement  for  an
employee  seeking compensation  for alleged unpaid overtime under the
FLSA   was  relatively lenient; a complaint  only needed   to contain
conclusory  allegations of a statutory violation in order to proceed to
discovery.4 For example, the requirement would be met  if an employee
alleged that the employer failed to pay overtime wages to an employee
who   worked   more   than   forty hours   in  one  week.   However,
contemporary  jurisprudence in this area has changed in the wake of two
U.S. Supreme  Court cases that established a higher pleading standard for
all cases: Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly5 and Ashcroft v. Iqbal.6


* Associate Member, 2015-16 University of Cincinnati Law Review.
     1. Wage  and  Hour   Division Historical  Summary,  DEP'T  OF  LABOR,
http://www.dol.gov/whd/about/history/whdhist.htm (last visited May 2, 2016).
     2. Id.
     3. See Ben James, FLSA, FMLA Lawsuits Soaring, New Statistics Show, Law360 (March 11,
2015) http://www.1aw360.com/articles/630168/flsa-finla-lawsuits-soaring-new-statistics-show  (data
released by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts in March 2015 showed a 20 year high in the
number of FLSA cases filed over the previous 12 month period).
     4. See Takacs v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., 444 F. Supp. 2d 1100, 1106-07 (S.D. Cal. 2006).
     5. 550 U.S. 544, 577 (2007).
     6. 556 U.S. 662, 670 (2009).


1455

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most