About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

80 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1841 (2013)
Equal Opportunity: Federal Employees' Right to Sue on Title VII and Tort Claims

handle is hein.journals/uclr80 and id is 1865 raw text is: Equal Opportunity: Federal Employees'
Right to Sue on Title VII and Tort Claims
Kristin Sommers Czubkowskit
INTRODUCTION
For three years, Donald Rochon experienced a systematic
campaign of racial discrimination and harassment from his
coworkers that extended far beyond their mutual workplace. In
addition to being subjected to racially discriminatory stories re-
garding African Americans told by his coworkers, Rochon had
his competence impugned behind his back, received hate mail
and harassing phone calls, experienced assault and battery, and
bore threats of death, mutilation, castration, and rape, among
other abusive events.1
Had Rochon worked for a private employer, there is little
question that he could recover under a Title VII employment
discrimination claim as well as under several state tort causes of
action. The Supreme Court affirmed the nonexclusivity of Title
VII's remedies for private-sector employees in cases such as Al-
exander v Gardner-Denver Co2 and Johnson v Railway Express
Agency, Inc.3 In these cases, the Court recognized that the legis-
lative history of Title VII manifests a congressional intent to al-
low an individual to pursue independently his rights under both
Title VII and other applicable state and federal statutes, and
that the clear inference is that Title VII was designed to sup-
plement, rather than supplant, existing laws and institutions re-
lating to employment discrimination.4
However, because Donald Rochon worked for the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, one of the first motions against him in
his employment discrimination lawsuit was a motion to dismiss
t BS 2008, University of Wisconsin; JD Candidate 2014, The University of Chicago
Law School.
1 See Rochon v Federal Bureau of Investigation, 691 F Supp 1548, 1551-52 (DDC
1988).
2 415 US 36 (1974).
3 421 US 454 (1975).
4 Alexander, 415 US at 48-49.

1841

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most