About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

23 Colum. Sci. & Tech. L. Rev. 192 (2021)
Policing Proof-of-Stake Networks: Regulatory Challenges Presented by Staking-as-a-Service Providers and the Need for a Tailored Regime

handle is hein.journals/cstlr23 and id is 192 raw text is: COLUM. SCI. & TECH. L. REV. THE COLUMBIA SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LAW REVIEW VOLUME XXIII STLR.ORG FALL 2021 NOTE POLICING PROOF-OF-STAKE NETWORKS: REGULATORY CHALLENGES PRESENTED BY STAKING-AS-A-SERVICE PROVIDERS AND THE NEED FOR A TAILORED REGIME Jessica S. Hart* Blockchain networks have increasingly turned to proof-of-stake (PoS) protocols as a mechanism for discouraging bad behavior and securing participants' data. In doing so, they have not only improved their energy consumption but also increased their accessibility. Still, the technological proficiency required of participants in PoS networks presents certain barriers to inclusivity. Third-party services known as staking-as-a-service (StaaS) providers have emerged as a popular solution to participants personally securing the network. The nature of this sub-contractual relationship has raised questions regarding the need for their regulation. In response to regulatory concerns, some practitioners have suggested that StaaS arrangements should qualify as investment contracts per SEC v. Howey and thus securities under the Securities Act of 1933. While much litigation has surrounded the question of whether cryptocurrencies vis-a-vis initial coin offerings (ICOs) constitute securities, none has yet addressed the question on StaaS providers within these networks. Accordingly, this Note explores the potential arguments in favor and against regulating StaaS providers as issuers of securities under Howey. It argues that the uniqueness of and variations among StaaS contracts make these arrangements unsuitable for regulation as securities. Instead, both StaaS users and * Columbia Law School, J.D., 2022. With gratitude to Professor Joshua Mitts for his invaluable insights and guidance, Notes Editor Karen Kim for her encouragement, and my father, Steve, for his pragmatic eye. I would also like to thank the Columbia Science and Technology Law Review staff for their thorough edits and the Executive Board for awarding this Note the Julius Silver Prize. 192 [Vol. 23.192

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most