About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

26 LJIL 667 (2013)
The Contribution of the Eichmann Trial to International Law

handle is hein.journals/lejint26 and id is 694 raw text is: 

Leiden Journal ofinternational Law (2013), 26, pp. 667-699
Q Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International LaW 2013  doi:Io.1o17/S922 156513000290



HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS AND

TRIBUNALS



The Contribution of the Eichmann Trial

to   International Law


WILLIAM  SCHABAS   OC  MRIA*





   Abstract
   The trial of Adolf Eichmann was poorly received by many contemporary observers, who felt
   that it bent the law beyond recognition in several key areas. With the renaissance of interna-
   tional criminal law in recent decades, the handling of difficult issues by the District Court of
   Jerusalem and the Supreme Court has been shown to fare rather well. The understanding of
   the relationship between crimes against humanity and genocide by the Israeli courts, and their
   response to the charge of retroactive criminality, to the consequences of the kidnapping, and
   to claims that the tribunal lacked impartiality, have also stood the test of time. Perhaps most
   important of all, the Eichmann decisions actually moved the law forward on the question of
   universal jurisdiction, effectively setting aside the narrow jurisdictional frame set by the 1948
   Genocide Convention. Critics at the time of the judgments, possibly influenced by the famous
   but harsh commentary of Hannah Arendt, were much too negative in their assessments.

   Key words
   Eichmann; universal jurisdiction; retroactivity; crimes against humanity; male captus bene
   detentus


I.  INTRODUCTION

The  Eichmann  trial is important in the history of international criminal law for
several reasons. Eichmann is the first reported judgment based upon the provisions of
the 1948 Convention  for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
It was the first conviction for crimes against humanity committed  in peacetime.
Although  universal jurisdiction had long been accepted and exercised with respect
to certain types of international or transnational crimes, such as piracy, this was its
first use for an atrocity crime. The trial addressed other difficult issues that have
vexed national and international judges to this day, such as exercise of jurisdiction



*   Professor of International Law, Middlesex University, London; Professor of International Criminal Law and
    Human Rights, Leiden University; Emeritus Professor of Human Rights Law, National University of Ireland,
    Galway [w.schabas@mdx.ac.uk].

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most