About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

84 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 877 (2009-2010)
Development of Ectogenesis: How Will Artificial Wombs Affect the Legal Status of a Fetus or Embryo

handle is hein.journals/chknt84 and id is 893 raw text is: DEVELOPMENT OF ECTOGENESIS: HOW WILL ARTIFICIAL
WOMBS AFFECT THE LEGAL STATUS OF A FETUS OR EMBRYO?
JESSICA H. SCHULTZ*
INTRODUCTION
Artificial womb1 technology would allow conception and fetal devel-
opment to occur completely independent of a woman's womb or allow a
fetus to be transferred from a woman's womb to an artificial womb for the
remainder of its gestation.2 Both of these possibilities raise a variety of
legal and ethical questions. Some commentators see ectogenesis, which is
the process of the embryo or fetus developing in a device outside of the
body, as a valuable medical development.3 For example, ectogenesis could
help those who cannot carry a pregnancy have genetic children without a
surrogate and could also save the lives of premature babies.4 Others assert
that the development of artificial wombs will cause babies to be treated as
commodities and will debase women by replacing one of a woman's most
unique natural abilities with man-made technology.5 The potential of this
technology is fraught with legal questions, including how artificial wombs
will affect the potential father's and the state's interest in the fetus; whether
contracts regarding artificial wombs might be enforceable; and who would
bear liability for mishaps that might occur due to artificial womb use.6
* J.D., Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology, 2009; B.A. Northwestern
University, English Literature, 2006. I would like to thank Professor Lori Andrews and Michael Loters-
tein for their insightful comments during the drafting process. I would also like to thank my husband
Steven and son Aidan for their love and support.
1. Artificial womb describes the actual device that holds the embryo or fetus, while ectogenesis
is the process of the embryo or fetus developing in the device outside the body. Frida Simonstein,
Artificial Reproduction Technologies (RTs)-All the Way to the Artificial Womb?, 9 MED. HEALTH
CARE & PHIL. 359, 359 (2006).
2. STEPHEN COLEMAN, THE ETHICS OF ARTIFICIAL UTERUSES: IMPLICATIONS FOR
REPRODUCTION AND ABORTION 81 (2004).
3. See PETER SINGER & DEANE WELLS, MAKING BABIES: THE NEW SCIENCE AND ETHICS OF
CONCEPTION, 118-19 (1985); Amel Alghrani, The Legal and Ethical Ramifications of Ectogenesis, 2
ASIAN J. WTO & INT'L HEALTH L. & POL'Y 189,190-91 (2007).
4. SINGER & WELLS, supra note 3, at 118-19; Alghrani, supra note 3, at 191.
5. See e.g., Irina Aristarkhova, Ectogenesis and Mother as Machine, 3 BODY & SOC'Y 43 (2005);
Stephen M. Armstrong, Womb and Board: Medical Advances in Reproduction-At What Costs?, 4
MED. TRIAL TECH. Q. (ANNUAL) 465 (1987); Julien S. Murphy, Is Pregnancy Necessary? Feminist
Concerns about Ectogenesis, 4 HYPATiA 66 (1989).
6. There are various other legal issues with respect to access to this technology and how experi-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most