About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2017 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1299 (2017)
Tripping over Legal Highs: Why the Controlled Substances Analogue Enforcement Act Is Ineffective against Designer Drugs

handle is hein.journals/unilllr2017 and id is 1325 raw text is: 








TRIPPING OVER LEGAL HIGHS: WHY THE CONTROLLED
SUBSTANCES ANALOGUE ENFORCEMENT ACT IS
INEFFECTIVE AGAINST DESIGNER DRUGS

                                                JEREMY   MANDELL*


       Though  the United States has an established framework of clas-
  sifying and combating traditional drugs, the relatively new problem of
  synthetic drugs calls for a similarly new solution. This Note discusses
  the established legal tools we have used in the past and highlights their
  insufficiencies in contending with synthetic drugs. It also describes
  methods  implemented  in other countries, along with proposed solu-
  tions that have popped up in our legislature in recent years.
       Ultimately, this Note recognizes that our status quo drug laws
   were built for a different time and are too slow to react to the ana-
   logues and synthetics of today. To update the laws suitable for this
   new frontier, this Note proposes four changes. First, this Note sug-
   gests that the United States amend the Controlled Substances Act to
   eliminate loopholes and allow for more flexible scheduling. Second, it
   advises that we take a second look at our current scheduling to ensure
   that it comports with our current knowledge of drugs. Third, it sug-
   gests that we legalize those drugs that we know are less harmful. Fi-
   nally, it recommends that we promote education about drugs, both le-
   gal and illegal. With the changes this Note proposes, our drug laws
   can be updated for the modern era and the challenges we now face.

                           TABLE  OF CONTENTS
 1.    INTRODUCTION        .............................................. 1300
 II.   BACKGROUND           ..................................... ..... 1303
       A.  What Are Designer Drugs?...............      ............. 1303
       B.  What's Wrong with Designer Drugs? ................ 1305
       C.  Regulation Issues .............................. 1307
       D.  How  Other Countries Are Dealing with Designer Drugs .... 1310
 III.  ANALYSIS             ............................................... 1313
       A.  The Loopholes in the CSAEA     ................    ..... 1313
           1. What Does  Substantially Similar Mean? ..................... 1314
           2. Structural Issues....      ......................... 1316


    *  J.D. Candidate, 2017, University of Illinois College of Law. I would like to thank Professor
 Andrew D. Leipold for his guidance in writing this Note. I would also like to thank the editors, mem-
 bers, and staff of the University of Illinois Law Review. I dedicate this Note to my mother and father
 for their overwhelming love and support.


1299

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most