About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

58 Howard L.J. 825 (2014-2015)
Should the American Grand Jury Survive Ferguson

handle is hein.journals/howlj58 and id is 857 raw text is: 










                               ESSAY


         Should the American Grand Jury

                      Survive Ferguson?



                      ROGER A. FAIRFAX, JR.*


         The grand jurors deliberated in secret, as the masses demanded
     the indictment of the would-be defendants. Ultimately, the grand
     jury would refuse to indict, enraging the many who believed justice
     had been denied.

     This  is a story inspired  not by  recent events  in Ferguson   and
 Staten Island, but by  the seventeenth  century  royal prosecutions  of
 Stephen  Colledge and  the Earl of Shaftesbury, who  had grappled  with
 King Charles  II over religious influence.' The  London   grand  jurors'
 resistance of the monarchy  established the grand jury's reputation as a
 robust check  on  governmental   power.2  By  the time  the grand  jury
 crossed the Atlantic  and  was  used to resist loyalist prosecutions of
 American   colonists, it had earned  the prestige worthy   of enshrine-
 ment in the Bill of Rights.' That  was then.
     Today's  grand jury is the target of tremendous criticism. Typecast
by  competing  narratives  of pliant ineffectiveness and unaccountable
power,  the grand  jury has long been  a frequent  whipping  boy  within

    *  Professor of Law and Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, George Washington
University Law School. This essay was prepared for the Criminal Law Research Collective
workshop at Howard University School of Law. Special thanks to Dean Danielle Holley-Walker
for her kind invitation and to the editors of the Howard Law Journal for their professionalism
and hard work in publishing this mini-symposium on Ferguson.
    1. See Mark Kadish, Behind the Locked Door of an American Grand Jury: Its History, Its
Secrecy, and Its Process, 24 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 1, 9 (1996); see also Roger A. Fairfax, Jr., Grand
Jury Discretion and Constitutional Design, 93 CORNELL L. REV. 703, 721-22 (2008).
    2. See Roger A. Fairfax, Jr., The Jurisdictional Heritage of the Grand Jury Clause, 91 MINN.
L. REV. 398, 409 (2006).
    3. See id. at 410-12; Roger A. Fairfax, Jr., Grand Jury Innovation: Toward a Functional
Makeover of the Ancient Bulwark of Liberty, 19 WM. & MARY BILL RTs. J. 339, 345-46 (2010).
2015 Vol. 58 No. 3


825

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most