About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

165 Solic. J. 74 (2022)
Singapore's Fintech and Crypto Regulations

handle is hein.journals/solicjo198 and id is 908 raw text is: COMPLIANCE Singapore's fintech and crypto regulations and outline the pitfalls fintech businesses should be aware of when considering opening a business in Singapore espite Singapore's reputation for ease of doing business, companies are frequently surprised to discover the regulatory landscape is a complex one which requires considerable knowledge to navigate. Below, we present five pitfalls a new fintech or crypto company needs to keep in mind. LEG IS LATION Singapore's fintech and crypto laws are extremely broad, which means various services are captured by the plain meaning of the legislative text. Additional analysis needs to be given to determine whether the intended offering falls under an exclusion and whether the activity intends to be regulated or will merely be the unfortunate victim of expansive drafting. It is difficult to distill a single formula to determine whether a service is regulated. The legislation is capable of regulating entities overseas (eg an overseas operator offering payment services in Singapore may be regulated) and regulating activities overseas (eg a Singapore entity that offers services internationally). INCIDENTAL SERVICES Compounding the broad scope of legislation is that there is no carve-out for incidental services. Hence, a tech-enabled business which offers an incidental payment service will still need to comply with regulations. For instance, if a bricks-and-mortar store sets up an online store and provides a wallet balance with e-money, e-money regulations would apply. The store will then need to figure out whether it can fall under exclusions such as the limited purpose e-money exclusion. REGULATING CRYPTO There is no single piece of legislation by which cryptocurrencies and digital assets are regulated. Instead, a cryptocurrency and digital assets provider may potentially be regulated as: (i) a digital payment token service provider under the Payment Services Act; (ii) a digital token provider under the Financial Services and Markets Act; (iii) an offeror of securities or capital market services provider under the Securities and Futures Act, or (iv) a commodity broker under the Commodity Trading Act. The above reflects an evolutionary and incremental approach by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in both the introduction of new laws to comply with Singapore's international obligations (such as FATF) and the adaption of existing laws to apply to cryptocurrencies and digital assets that have the same nature as existing asset classes. EVOLVING ATTITUDES MAS is constantly calibrating its regulatory response, so players can be caught off guard by sudden reactions due to market developments. Although MAS historically confined itself to discouraging retail speculation in cryptocurrencies, it has now taken a proactive approach. Following retail investors losing money in recent market crashes, MAS is now considering measures for cryptocurrency exchanges, such as the implementation of customer access controls such as knowledge tests and prohibiting leverage. MAS has also become vocal in decrying the unviable use cases and articulating what it believes are the use-cases in crypto (mainly a focus on tokenising real-world assets, using blockchain technology for settlement and programmable money). It is unclear how MAS will treat licence applications that do not fall under its articulated use cases. On the fintech side, there are encouraging signs of liberalisation, such as a proposed increase of limits on e-wallets. The regulatory attitude is still fundamentally pro-innovation. The clampdown is only due to risks materialising. EXTERNAL ADVISERS When a business hopes to open in Singapore and obtain a licence, regulators expect substantial activities to be carried out, in terms of business functions and compliance. An over-reliance on external advisers or consultants during the licence application process is a pitfall as it indicates the client is not prepared to carry out the substantial activities expected. Ideally, a licence applicant should be able to assemble the team or at least have key hires in place before embarking on a licence application. That will enable the business to navigate the pitfalls discussed in this article. 74 / December 2022 / solicitorsjournal comr SOLICITORS JOURNAL Chia Ling is the managing partner of OC Queen Street LLC and a member of Osborne Clarke's international legal practice. Norvin Chan is a senior associate at Osborne Clarke's Singapore office osborneclarke.com Singapore's fintech and crypto laws tend to be extremely broad, meaning various services are captured by the plain meaning of the legislative text 165/12

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most