About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

97 Ind. L.J. 1261 (2022)
Tokenized: The Law of Non-Fungible Tokens and Unique Digital Property

handle is hein.journals/indana97 and id is 1313 raw text is: Tokenized: The Law of Non-Fungible Tokens and Unique Digital Property JOSHUA A.T. FAIRFIELD* Markets for unique digital property digital equivalents of rare artworks, collectible trading cards, and other assets that gain value from scarcity-have exploded in the past few years. At root is the next iteration of blockchain technology, unique digital assets called non-fungible tokens. Unlike bitcoin, where one coin is the same as another, NFTs are unique, each with different attributes. An NFT that represented ownership of Boardwalk would be quite different from one that represented Baltic Avenue. NFTs have grown from a few early breakout successes to a rapidly developing market for unique digital treasures. The attraction to buyers is that, unlike digital assets like e-books or licensed movies, NFTs can be bought, sold, displayed, gifted, or even destroyed just like personal property. Yet law has not kept pace with demand for unique digital property. In particular, the rules designed for the 2000s internet focused on expanding intellectual property licenses and online contracts to the point that consumers are mere users, not owners, of digital assets. This end of ownership legal structure stands in stark contrast to the expectations of those who create, buy, sell, and invest in NFTs. This article proposes a clear path for the evolution of the legal underpinnings of NFTs. It argues that NFTs are personal property, not contracts (despite the smart contracts popular nomenclature) or pure intellectual property licenses (despite the currently governing law of digital assets like e-books). Because transactions in NFTs are in the form of a sale, the law of sales of personal property should apply. And finally, the article notes that NFTs will serve as a powerful, grounding example of digital personal property, a legal form of ownership that is both sorely needed and has not yet been clearly established online. That example will ground others, and permit law to again characterize those who buy scarce and valuable digital assets as true owners rather than mere users. * Joshua A.T. Fairfield, William D. Bain Family Professor of Law, W&L University School of Law. Thanks go to Aaron Wright, Gus Hurwitz, Kiel Brennan-Marquez, Aaron Perzanowski, Leandra Lederman, Chris Seaman, Juliet Moringiello, Chris Odinet, and all of the participants in the Law and Technology Workshop Series. Thanks to the Frances Lewis Law Center for funding in support of this scholarship, and thanks to Nate Reynolds and John Coffron for research support.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most