About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

60 Harv. Int'l L.J. 1 (2019)
Do Alternative Justice Mechanisms Deserve Recognition in International Criminal Law: Truth Commissions, Amnesties, and Complementarity at the International Criminal Court

handle is hein.journals/hilj60 and id is 4 raw text is: 














VOLUME 60, NUMBER 1, WINTER 2019


        Do Alternative Justice Mechanisms Deserve

        Recognition in International Criminal Law?:

               Truth Commissions, Amnesties, and

               Complementarity at the International

                                    Criminal Court





                                        Martha Minow*




        In the aftermath of crimes against humanity and gross violations of human rights, should interna-
     tional legal institutions promote the use of criminal sanctions or instead support forgiveness and reconcilia-
     tion Either response is better than sience, but comparing prosecutions and reconciliatory steps brings tough
     choices, both legally and politill. Adversarial criminal prosecution holds the promise of generating
     facts, holding individuas accountab, and deterring future horrific conduct, but criminal trials ao can
     be time-consuming, expensive, inevitably slective, remote in time and location from the lives of those most
     affected, and indiffrent to the goals of social peace and personal healing. Truth and reconciliation com-
     missions, exemplified by South Africa's effort follouing th end of Apartheid, represent an alternative
     justice mechanism that pursues truth-telling and opportunities for reconciliation, rather than punishment.
     Such methods can provide occasions for individual wi rongdoers to apologize, and for victims and survivors
     to forgive, but these methods can also b marred by corruption, compromise, and an appearance of condoning
     terrible acts. Trading truth for punishment m(y offer a predicate for social reconciliation, but unondi-
     tional amnesties following terrible vioence-and pardons following flawed trias-slikdy signal political
     pressures to sacrifice justice.
        The choice among approaches is left open in the design of the International Criminal Court (ICC),
     which seeks to encourage domestic legal systems to pursue international crimes against humanity, genocide,
     and other gross violations of human rights within their national justice systems. Through its notion of
     complementarity, the ICC setks to localize international norms through a relationship between domestic
     courts and a permanent Court with potential jurisdiction across the world; the ICC actually loses its
     authority to proceed when the domestic jurisdiction does so in an adequate way. To set the standards for
     international justicea nd to build capacity to pursue justice in nations where mass violnce occurs-
     should the international institution treat truth commissions, grants ofamnesty, and other alternatives to
     prosecution as satisfying the predicate of national action that in turn deprives the ICC of authority to
     proceed. This A rticle analyzes the debates around alternatives to trials in fulfilling complementarity and
     advances recognition of some domestic restorative justice processes under specified criteria. Th issues this
     Article explores have implications not only for international criminal justice but also for alternatives to
     adjudication in national and local responses to any criminal conduct.






   * 300th Anniversary University Professor, Harvard University. This work could not have been writ-
ten without the help and guidance of Daniel Saver. Lara Berlin, Alyssa Bernstein, Marissa Brodney, Jon
Gould, Gerard Kennedy, Zoe Brennan-Krohn, Ariel Eckblad, Jessica Levin, Christopher Marks, Sonia
McNeil, Dalia Palombo, Jason Qu, Alex Rodney, Cristina Ros, and Jeanne Segil also contributed valua-
ble research and comments. Special thanks to Christopher Hampson, Sharon Kim, and Rachel Keeler for
editorial assistance.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most