About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

44 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 1 (2009)
Voter Fraud or Voter Defrauded? Highlighting an Inconsistent Consideration of Election Fraud

handle is hein.journals/hcrcl44 and id is 3 raw text is: Voter Fraud or Voter Defrauded?
Highlighting an Inconsistent Consideration
of Election Fraud
Jocelyn Friedrichs Benson*
This Article seeks to highlight the collateral effect of several inconsistent
recent federal court decisions that consider a state's interest in addressing the
impact of fraud on the electoral process. In an effort to evaluate the impact of
varying types of election-related fraud on the political process, I propose that
courts view the concept with a focus on (1) the entity that commits the deceptive
acts and (2) the effect those acts have on the democratic process. Evaluating
recent opinions through this lens illustrates that federal courts are more likely to
exhibit deference to a state's interest in limiting avenues for voters acting fraud-
ulently, or what I term voter-initiated fraud, than to issues relating to what I
call voter-targeted fraud, or actions by various entities intended to deceive,
defraud, or intimidate voters. Conversely, quantitative and qualitative evidence,
while only mildly conclusive, suggests that the most prevalent and problematic
type of election fraud is voter-targeted fraud.
This Article suggests that federal courts' current inconsistent evaluation of
a state's interest in addressing election fraud stems in part from the lack of a test
for evaluating that interest. Such a test should differentiate between the several
different types of fraudulent acts that can affect the electoral process. Specifi-
cally, I argue that courts could engage in a more consistent approach by linking
the analysis of the state's interest in combating election fraud to both the level of
broad qualitative and quantitative evidence available regarding the prevalence
of that particular strain of fraud, and to the constitutional rights that the fraudu-
lent acts, and limits on those acts, implicate.
1. INTRODUCTION
Multiple entities, from poll workers to candidates, voters to volunteers,
election administrators to challengers, interact to ensure that the outcomes of
elections match and reflect the will of a majority of voters. Any of these
entities, however, is capable of committing potentially fraudulent acts that
threaten the legitimacy of an electoral outcome. Individuals volunteers may
misrepresent the subject of a ballot initiative campaign to garner support or
signatures to place the initiative on the ballot,' or may submit false registra-
* Assistant Professor of Law, Wayne State University Law School. B.A. Wellesley Col-
lege; M.Phil, Oxford University; J.D., Harvard Law School. I am grateful for the suggestions
and comments provided by Heather Gerken, Zanita Fenton, Michael Pitts, James Tucker, Ellen
Dannin, Lance Gable, and Derek Bambauer in the formulation of this article. I am also in-
debted to Melanie Elturk and Tierney Eaton for their invaluable and meticulous research assis-
tance. All errors and omissions are my own.
IHoward Fischer, Petitioners Accused of Misleading Signers, ARIZ. DAILY STAR.NET,
June 6, 2007, http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/187145 (describing petition gatherers
who encouraged voters to endorse a petition for a ballot initiative to lower gasoline prices
when the petition itself was about changing the redistricting process).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most