About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

25 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L. 1 (1948)
The Binding Force of a Recommendation of the General Assembly of the United Nations

handle is hein.journals/byrint25 and id is 7 raw text is: THE BINDING FORCE OF A 'RECOMMENDATION' OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS'
By F. BLAINE SLOAN, LL.B., LL.M.
Of the Nebraska and New York Bar; Legal Department, United Nations Secretariat
THE General Assembly is established by the Charter as the great delibera-
tive organ of the United Nations. It may discuss and make recommenda-
tions concerning any matter which affects the peace of the world or the
general welfare of nations. It has been characterized as an international
forum, as the 'town meeting of the world'. But the General Assembly was
not constituted a world legislature, and its resolutions are not in and of
themselves law in the same sense as are enactments of national parliaments.
This statement, however, is by no means the equivalent of a negative
answer to the question whether a resolution of the General Assembly
possesses binding force. The problem of the effect of a General Assembly
resolution containing a recommendation to a Member state offers a fertile
field for investigation by scholars and experimentation by international
statesmen.2 While the term 'resolution' is applied to all determinations of
the General Assembly, the major problem of binding force concerns the
obligatory effect of the resolutions containing recommendations to the
Member states under Articles io to 14 of the Charter.
The experience of the United Nations during its first years has con-
tributed little to the determination of the exact status of a resolution of the
General Assembly. The opinions officially expressed vary from the sugges-
tion that certain resolutions are not only legally binding but may be en-
forced, to the opposite position that no resolution can create either a legal
or a moral obligation. Between these extremes may be found numerous
statements attributing to a resolution varying degrees of persuasive or
moral force, but adding little to the clarification of the problem.
It is not surprising that there has been no satisfactory and universally
accepted formulation of the legal effect of a resolution of an international
conference. For much the same disagreement exists in certain quarters in
regard to the legal status of international law in its traditional and positive
forms. There are lawyers who deny that international law can properly be
considered more than international morality. While the arguments support-
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and are not to be identified
with those of any organization or group with which he may be associated.
2 Sayre, 'Legal Problems arising from the United Nations Trusteeship System', in A.J. 42
(1948), p. 273, writes: 'Does the affirmative vote of the General Assembly embodying a recom-
mendation create a definite obligation, legal or otherwise, and, if so, of exactly what character
is the obligation? This is a problem of enormous consequence, as yet unsolved.' See also Kunz,
'The BogotA Charter of the Organization of American States', in ibid., pp. 575, 588; Fenwick,
International Law (1948), p. 79; U.N. Docs. A/AC.19/33 (to February 1948), p. 4; A/C.3/SR.
io8 (22 October 1948), p. 8.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most