About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 997 (2009)
Negligence Per Se and Res Ipsa Loquitur: Kissing Cousins

handle is hein.journals/wflr44 and id is 1007 raw text is: NEGLIGENCE PER SE AND RES IPSA LOQUITUR:
KISSING COUSINS
Aaron D. Twerski *
At first glance, negligence per se and res ipsa loquitur appear to
have little in common, except that they are found adjacent to each
other in the chapter on negligence in most torts casebooks.'
However, the two doctrines actually share a common theme. In
both, plaintiffs seek to prove negligence based on a generalization.
A defendant can prevail only by showing that the generalization
should not apply to the particular facts of his or her case. The
Restatement (Third) of Torts, in these two areas, would be more
effective and more principled if it focused on the issue of when it is
proper to rely on a generalization and when we must abandon the
generalization in favor of a more fact-sensitive inquiry into the
actor's conduct. General principles can be articulated that explain
important aspects of these two doctrines; however, they seem to get
lost in the detailed application of the Restatement (Third)'s various
sections.  As a former Restatement reporter, I am     sensitive to
academicians taking potshots at carefully      crafted  rules and
2
comments. I admire the work Professors Green and Powers have
produced,3 so much so that I feel free to critique their work and
suggest some modifications that I believe would enhance their final
work product.
* Irwin and Jill Cohen Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School. B.S.,
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 1970; J.D., Marquette University, 1965;
A.B., Beth Medrash Elyon Research Institute, 1962.
1. See, e.g., MARC A. FRANKLIN, ROBERT L. RABIN & MICHAEL D. GREEN,
TORT LAW AND ALTERNATIVES: CASES AND MATERIALS 75-109 (8th ed. 2006);
THOMAS C. GALLIGAN ET AL., TORT LAW: CASES, PERSPECTIVES, AND PROBLEMS
207-30 (4th ed. 2007); ROBERT E. KEETON ET AL., TORT AND ACCIDENT LAW: CASES
AND MATERIALS 398-440 (4th ed. 2004); VICTOR E. SCHWARTZ ET AL., PROSSER,
WADE AND SCHWARTZ'S TORTS: CASES AND MATERIALS 204-58 (11th ed. 2005);
AARON D. TwERSKI & JAMES A. HENDERSON, JR., TORTS: CASES AND MATERIALS
161-92 (2d ed. 2008).
2. The author was a coreporter with Professor James A. Henderson, Jr. for
the RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF TORTS: PRODUCTS LIAB. (1998).
3. In another forum, the author has expressed some difference of opinion
with the drafting of RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF TORTS: LIAB. FOR PHYSICAL HARM §
7 (Proposed Final Draft No. 1, 2005). See Aaron D. Twerski, The Cleaver, the
Violin and the Scalpel: Duty and the Restatement (Third) of Torts, 60 HASTINGS
L.J. 1, 3-5 (2008).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most