About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

42 Wash. L. Rev. 903 (1966-1967)
Recent Developments

handle is hein.journals/washlr42 and id is 921 raw text is: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
FELONY INFORMATION: DUE PROCESS AND
PRELIMINARY HEARING ON PROBABLE CAUSE
Defendants were charged with manslaughter by an information
filed directly in superior court. They made timely motion to dismiss,
contending that the information was defective because not found
before a grand jury, or alternatively that due process required a deter-
mination before either a grand jury or a committing magistrate that
probable cause existed to hold the defendants for trial. The motion was
granted. On appeal, the Washington Supreme Court reversed. Held:
Due process does not require persons charged with an infamous crime
to be indicted by a grand jury or afforded a preliminary hearing on the
issue of probable cause, State v. Kanistanaux, 68 Wash. Dec. 2d 647,
414 P.2d 784 (1966).
There are four modes of commencing felony prosecution in Wash-
ington: grand jury indictment,' direct information,2 coroner's inquest,3
and felony complaint4 In urban areas of the state, the standard prac-
tice is to refer the decision on probable cause to a committing magis-
trate, and to reserve the grand jury for cases requiring use of its
inquisitorial powers.5 In rural areas, however, the direct filing proce-
dure is the prevalent mode of commencing prosecutions.6 Although
indictment by grand jury is constitutionally required to commence
federal prosecutions for infamous crimes,7 the U.S. Supreme Court in
Hurtado v. Californias held that states may prosecute such crimes by
IWASH. CONST. art. I § 25; WASH. Rxv. CODE ch. 10.28 (1956) passiln; WASH.
REv. CODE § 10.37.015 (1956).
'WASH. CONST. art. I, § 25; WASH. REv. CODE § 10.37.026 (1956).
'WASH. REV. CODE § 36.24.070-.080, .100 (1963).
'WASH. REV. CODE §§ 10.16.010, .070-.080 (1956); WASH. R. CRix. CTs. LTD.
JURISDICTION 2.01, 2.03e(2).
'Brief of the Washington State Association of Prosecuting Attorneys as Amicus
Curiae, p. 4, Kanistanaux.
'Ibid. The direct information procedure places the accused on trial without
indictment or preliminary hearing to inquire into probable cause. It consists of
the filing by the prosecutor with the court of a signed and verified statement charging
the accused with commission of the offense in ordinary and concise language com-
prehensible to a person of common understanding. WASH. REv. CODE § 10.37.050
(1956).
U.S. CoNsT. amend. V.
8110 U.S. 516 (1884). The California constitution required as a prerequisite to
filing a felony information that an accused be examined before a committing
[903]

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most