About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

106 Geo. L.J. 1353 (2017-2018)
Regulating Online Content Moderation

handle is hein.journals/glj106 and id is 1367 raw text is: Regulating Online Content Moderation KYLE LANGVARDT* The Supreme Court held in 2017 that the vast democratic forums of the Internet in general, and social media in particular, are the most important places ... for the exchange of views. Yet within these forums, speakers are subject to the closest and swiftest regime of censorship the world has ever known. This censorship comes not from the government, but from a small number of private corporations-Facebook, Twitter, Google-and a vast corps of human and algorithmic content modera- tors. The content moderators' work is indispensable; without it, social media users would drown in spam and disturbing imagery. At the same time, content moderation practices correspond only loosely to First Amendment values. Leaked internal training manuals from Facebook reveal content moderation practices that are rushed, ad hoc, and at times incoherent. The time has come to consider legislation that would guarantee meaningful speech rights in online spaces. This Article evaluates a range of possible approaches to the problem. These include (1) an administra- tive monitoring-and-compliance regime to ensure that content modera- tion policies hew closely to First Amendment principles; (2) a personal accountability regime handing control of content moderation over to users; and (3) a relatively simple requirement that companies disclose their moderation policies. Each carries serious pitfalls, but none is as dangerous as option (4): continuing to entrust online speech rights to the private sector. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. . .................................................... 1354 1. THE DILEMMA OF THE MODERATORS.............................. 1358 II. MANDATORY LIMITS ON CONTENT MODERATION .................... 1363 A. FIRST AMENDMENT OBJECTIONS TO LIMITS ON CONTENT M ODERATION............................................ 1364 B. THE NEED FOR CONGRESSIONAL ACTION....................... 1366 * Associate Professor, University of Detroit Mercy School of Law. ( 2018, Kyle Langvardt. The author thanks Yafeez Fatabhoy for his valuable research assistance. The author further thanks William Araiza, Erin Archerd, Eric Berger, Gus Hurwitz, Kate Klonick, Chris Lund, Helen Norton, Harvey Perlman, Alex Tsesis, Spencer Weber Walter, and Maggie Wittlin. 1353

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most