About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

49 U.C.D. L. Rev. 1511 (2015-2016)
Navigating the Uber Economy

handle is hein.journals/davlr49 and id is 1531 raw text is: 








                             ESSAY


       Navigating the Uber Economy

                Benjamin Meanst* &Joseph A. Seiner**

  In litigation against ride-sharing companies Uber and Lyft, former
drivers have alleged that they were misclassified as independent
contractors and denied employment benefits. The companies have
countered that they do not employ drivers but merely license access to a
platform that matches those who need rides with nearby, available drivers.
At stake are the prospects, not only for Uber and Lyft, but for a nascent,
multi-billion dollar, on-demand economy.
  Unfortunately, existing  laws fail to provide adequate guidance
regarding the distinction between independent contractors and employees,
especially when applied to the hybrid working arrangements common in a
modern economy. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act and analogous
state laws, courts consider several factors to assess the economic reality
of a worker's alleged employment status; yet, there is no objective basis for
prioritizing those factors.
  This Essay argues that the classification of workers as independent
contractors or employees should be shaped by an overarching inquiry:
How much flexibility do individuals have in determining the time, place,
price, manner, and frequency of the work they perform? Those who select
these variables are more independent than those who must accommodate
themselves to a business owner's schedule. Our approach is novel and
would provide an objective basis for adjudicating classification disputes,
especially those that arise in the context of the on-demand economy. By
reducing legal uncertainty, this focus on worker flexibility would ensure

   t Copyright © 2016 Benjamin Means and Joseph A. Seiner.
     Associate Professor of Law, University of South Carolina School of Law.
     Professor of Law, University of South Carolina School of Law. The authors
would like to thank the Honorable Mark Bennett, Miriam Cherry, Timothy Glynn,
Benjamin Gutman, Susan Kuo, Jeffrey Pagano, and Thomas Rutledge for their helpful
comments on earlier versions of this Essay. Megan Clemency, Arden Lowndes,
Elizabeth McCann, and Colton Tully-Doyle provided superb research assistance.


1511

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most