About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

10 Crim. Just. 19 (1995-1996)
Dual and Successive Prosecution Policy

handle is hein.journals/cjust10 and id is 145 raw text is: Dual and Successive
Prosecution Policy (Petite Policy)
The following represents a coplepte revision of USAM 9-2.142. It supersedes all prior Department
(of justice,) guidelines and policy statemnents on the same subject:
I. STATEMENT0OF POLICY                               9 -27 .I10, elseq.
A. This policy establishes guidelines for the exercise  JE. in order to ensure the most efficient use of law
of discretion  by appropriate officers of the      enforcemnent resources, whenever a matter involves
Dep~artmenit of justice in determining whether to  overlapping federal and state jurisdiction, federal
bring a federal pr Osecution based on substantially the  prosecutors should at the earliest possible time coor-
sarne act(s) or transaction(s) involved in a prior state  dinaite with their state Counterparts to determine the
or federal proceeding.'                            most appropriate single foruIm in which to proceed to
B. The purpose of this policy is to vindicate substan-  satisfy the substantial federal and state interests
tial federal interests through appropriate federal pros-  inVol ved, and to resolve all criminal liability for the
ecutions; to protect persons charged with criminal  acts in question if possible.
conduct fromn the burdens associated with multiple  11. TYPES OF PROSECUTIONS AS TO WHICH THIS
prosecutions and punishments for substantially the  POL 10Y A PPLIES4
same actks) or transactions(s); to promote efficient uti-  A. This policy applies whenever the contemplated
lizatiori of Department resources; and to promote  federal prosecution is based on substantially thle
coordination and cooperation between federal and   same- act(s) or transaction(s) involved in a prior' state
state prosecutors,                                 or federal prosecution.
C. This policy precludes the initiation or continuation  B. This policy constitutes an exercise of the
of a fed~eral prosecution, following a prior state or  Department's prosecutorial discretion, aind applies
federal prosecution based on substantially the samneevnwre
act(s) or transaction(s), unless:                  Ive  awprir  ae poeuin w ud  o  eal   a
ar Te  ollwingtredusanie: rcuiie                 subsequent federal prosecution under the Double
are stisfed:~Jeopardy Clause, due to the doctrine of dual soy-
a. the m~atter must involve a su~bstantial federal  ereignty, see Abbate v. Unitedl Staltes, 359) U .S. I 87
interest;                                       (1959); or
b. the prior prosecution must have left that     2, a prior prosecution VVOLId not legally bar a sub-
interest demonstrably Unvindlicated; and        Sequent ,late or federal prosecultion' under the
c. applying the same test applicable to all fed-  Doubhle jeopardy Clause, because each offense
eral Jplo)'e.cutions, the govrnEnt WIJMust believe  requires proof of an element not contained in the
that the, &fendarit(s) conduizt I ((nstitutes a, fed-  other' see Unitedl States v, Dixon, 11 3 S. Ctb 2849
eral o)ffewse, ]lnd that the idmk~ible evidence  (1993); BIockburger v Unitedl States, 284 U .S. 299
probhk \,yill be sufficient o obtain and sutain   I93)
aconvic_1tio by an unbiased trier of fact; Lind  C. This policy does not apply (and prior approval
2The follovwrng procedural prerequisite is satis-  therefore is nlot required pursuant to it I where the
fied;; the prosecution must be approved by the   Prior prOsecution involved only a minor part oif the
appropriate Assistant Attorney Gieneral.         Contemplated federal charges. For exam~ple, a federal
D.h Satisfaction of the substantive~ prerequisites in  l  conspiracy or RICO prosecutioni mray allege overt
I.C. 1! does not mean that a proposed pr'osecution  acts or predicate offenses previously prosecuted, as
mutbe approved or brought. The traditional ele-  long as those acts or offenses do not represent sub-
rret of feder~al prosecutorial discretion continue to  st-intially --the whole of the conitemxplated federal
applv. See Principkes of Federal Ptosecution, USAIM  charge, and (in a RIlCO proSecution) as long as there
are a Sufficient number of predicate offenses to suIs-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most