About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2006 BYU L. Rev. 1107 (2006)
Sarbanes-Oxley's Structural Model to Encourage Corporate Whistleblowers

handle is hein.journals/byulr2006 and id is 1119 raw text is: Sarbanes-Oxley's Structural Model To Encourage
Corporate Whistleblowers
Richard E. Moberly*
I. Introduction  ........................................................................  1107
II. The Need To Encourage More Effective Whistleblowing .... 1109
A. Information Problems and Traditional Corporate
M  onitors  .............................................................................  1 109
B. Overcoming Information Problems-Employees as
Corporate   M  onitors ............................................................. 1109
III. Two Whistleblower Models ............................................... 1109
A. Insufficiency of the Anti-retaliation Model ....................... 1109
B. Ineffectiveness of Pre-scandal Versions of the Structural
M  o d el .................................................................................  1 109
C. Sarbanes-Oxley's Structural Model .................................. 1109
IV. The Power of Sarbanes-Oxley's Structural Model ............... 1109
A . M ore  D isclosures  ............................................................ 1109
B. Less Blocking and Filtering .............................................. 1109
C . Secondary   Benefits .......................................................... 1109
V. Strengthening the Structural Model .................................... 1109
A. Mandating the Model Effectively ..................................... 1109
B. Addressing the Cheating Problem .................................... 1109
C. Addressing the Noise Problem        ........................................ 1109
V I. C onclusion  .......................................................................  1109
I. INTRODUCTION
Recent corporate scandals reveal opposing perspectives on the
ability of rank-and-file employees to be corporate monitors. From
one perspective, the scandals demonstrate employees' efficacy as
monitors with accurate insider knowledge about the inner workings
of their corporations. At great risk to their careers, a few employee
* Assistant Professor of Law, University of Nebraska College of Law; J.D., magna
cur laude, Harvard Law School. I truly appreciate the helpful comments from Jesica Eames,
Colleen Medill, Robert Moberly, Nancy Modesitt, Scott Moss, Michael Pitts, Kevin Ruser,
Joseph Slater, Lynne Webb, and Steve Willbom. I also thank Aaron Bishop and Scott Newman
for their excellent research assistance, and Kris Lauber and Sandra Placzek of the Marvin and
Virginia Schmid Law Library for their invaluable aid in tracking down important resources. A
McCollum Research Grant provided support for the research and writing of this Article.

1107

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most