About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 979 (2009)
Expanding Liability for Negligence Per Se

handle is hein.journals/wflr44 and id is 989 raw text is: EXPANDING LIABILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE PER SE
Ariel Porat*
INTRODUCTION
A breach of a statutory duty that results in harm often gives
rise to tort liability for the injurer toward the victim under the
doctrine of negligence per se. Under this doctrine, not all victims
can recover and not all types of injuries are compensable. For the
tort suit to succeed, the victim must fall within the class of persons
protected by the statute and the injury must be of the type that the
statute was intended to prevent.' These two conditions, which I call
the  limiting  liability  conditions, generate  controversy   and
litigation since it is not always clear which victims or which injuries
the legislature intended to address when enacting the particular
statute in question.
The normative argument this Article makes is that the weight
given to the limiting liability conditions should be dramatically
decreased. Whenever noncompliance with the statute increases the
risks to the class of persons to which the victim belongs or of the
type of injury the victim suffered and those risks are foreseeable,
there is a strong prima facie case for recognizing liability. This
should hold true even when the risks that materialized are usual, or
background, risks that in themselves would not justify the
enactment of the statute.
The positive argument made here is that many court decisions
that apply the limiting liability conditions to exclude tort liability
reach the right outcome but for the wrong reason. These are cases
in which the breach of the statutory duty did not increase the risk to
the victim's class or of the type of injury that resulted. This lack of
* Alain Poher Professor of Law, Tel Aviv University and Fischel-Neil
Distinguished Visiting Professor, University of Chicago. For helpful comments,
I thank Ronen Avraham, Oren Bar-Gill, Lee Anne Fennel, Michael Green, Ehud
Guttel, Assaf Jacob, Roy Kreitner, Saul Levmore, Rivka Peltz, Timna Porat,
Roni Schocken, Kenneth Simons, and the participants at the 2009 annual
meeting of the Israeli Law and Economics Association and the Law and
Economics workshop at Bar-Ilan University. I also thank Irit Brodskly for her
very able research assistance and Dana Rothman-Meshulam for her superb
language editing. Lastly, I thank the Wake Forest Law Review Editorial Board
for their careful editorial assistance.
1. See infra Part I.

979

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most