About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

67 Dep't of Just. J. Fed. L. & Prac. 183 (2019)
Higher Ground

handle is hein.journals/usab67 and id is 462 raw text is: 




Higher Ground
Paul Farley
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
  Wiley Blount Rutledge, Jr.'s tenure on the United States
Supreme  Court was fairly brief-only about six and a half years.
Accordingly, his jurisprudential legacy is limited: although he joined
the majority in the notorious Korematsu decision,' he also authored a
notable dissent in In re Yamashita.2 The latter case involved the
commanding   general of the Japanese Imperial Army in the
Philippines during the last year of World War II. Convicted of war
crimes and sentenced to death by a military commission, Yamashita
filed a habeas corpus petition arguing that he was not subject to the
jurisdiction of the military commission. The Supreme Court denied
the petition, but Rutledge took issue in soaring terms:
       More is at stake than General Yamashita's fate. There
       could be no possible sympathy for him if he is guilty of
       the atrocities for which his death is sought. But there
       can be and should be justice administered according to
       law. In this stage of war's aftermath it is too early for
       Lincoln's great spirit, best lighted in the Second
       Inaugural, to have wide hold for the treatment of foes. It
       is not too early, it is never too early, for the nation
       steadfastly to follow its great constitutional traditions,
       none older or more universally protective against
       unbridled power than due process of law in the trial and
       punishment of men, that is, of all men, whether citizens,
       aliens, alien enemies or enemy belligerents. It can
       become too late.3
  After detailing the manifold deficiencies in Yamashita's trial,4
Rutledge concluded by quoting Thomas Paine: He that would make



1 Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), abrogation recognized by
Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 2423 (2018).
2 327 U.S. 1 (1946).
3 Id. at 41-42 (Rutledge, J., dissenting).
4 Trial commenced just three weeks after arraignment. Id. at 57. '[T]he
prosecution presented evidence to show that the crimes were so extensive


DOJ  Journal of Federal Law and Practice


April 2019


183

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most