About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

9 U. Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L. 991 (2006-2007)
Enforcing Equal Employment Opportunities in China

handle is hein.journals/upjlel9 and id is 999 raw text is: ENFORCING EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN CHINA XUN ZENG I. INTRODUCTION: MR. JIANG TAO'S STORY' In December 2001, Jiang Tao, a law student at Sichuan University, read an advertisement, which indicated that the Chengdu Branch of People's Bank of China (PBOC), was hiring new staff members.2 The advertisement contained a minimum height requirement: male candidates were required to be at least 168cm (5ft 6in) tall and females 155cm (5ft 3in).3 Such height requirements are very common in China; thus, many qualified applicants for government positions are rejected because they are too short. Mr. Jiang is only 165 cm (5ft 5in) and therefore ineligible for the job. Mr. Jiang sought to challenge PBOC's hiring practice on the basis that it was employment discrimination.4 However, he faced one important legal constraint: neither constitutional nor national statutory provisions in China specifically prohibit height discrimination in workplace. Despite the lack of direct protection, Mr. Jiang filed suit under Article 33 of the 1993 Constitution of the People's Republic of China, which declares all citizens equal before the law.5 Mr. Jiang alleged that the minimum height requirement violated his constitutional right to equal treatment before the law.6 Specifically, he claimed that [t]he defendant should assume corresponding legal liabilities and asked the court to confirm the administrative action containing 'height discrimination' as illegal.' Mr. Jiang's case is significant not only because it was the first to 1. First Case Involving Right to Equality, BEJING REVIEW (Feb. 26, 2002), available at http://www.china.org.cn/english/2002/Feb/27798.htm (discussing the case brought by Mr. Jiang). 2. Id 3. Id. 4. Id. 5. XIAN FA [Constitution] art. 33 (1993) (P.R.C.), translated in 5 P.R.C. LAWS 8, 20. 6. First Case Involving Right to Equality, supra note 1. 7. Id.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most