About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

10 Beijing L. Rev. 656 (2019)
Hazy Agenda, Multiple Interests: Stakeholders Engagement with the First Phase of the Niger Delta Amnesty Deal in Nigeria

handle is hein.journals/beijlar10 and id is 591 raw text is: Scientific Research Publishing Beijing Law Review, 2019, 10, 656-670 http://www.scirp.org/iournal/blr ISSN Online: 2159-4635 ISSN Print: 2159-4627 Hazy Agenda, Multiple Interests: Stakeholders Engagement with the First Phase of the Niger Delta Amnesty Deal in Nigeria Isaac Olawale Albert Institute for Peace and Strategic Studies, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria Email: ioalbert2004@yahoo.com How to cite this paper: Albert, I. 0. (2019). Hazy Agenda, Multiple Interests: Stakeholders Engagement with the First Phase of the Niger Delta Amnesty Deal in Nigeria. Beijing LawReview, 10, 656-670. httvs://doiorg/10.4236/blr.2019. 104037 Received: January 6, 2019 Accepted: July 27, 2019 Published: July 30, 2019 Copyright @ 2019 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). h reativecommonssogiene/b/40 Abstract The oil-rich Niger Delta region of Nigeria is bedeviled by revolutionary vi- olence. The grouse of the militant youths in the region is that their communi- ties are degraded by oil prospecting activities of and also that they get too lit- tle from the federation allocations from the oil wealth controlled by the fed- eral government. Unable to defeat the militants militarily, the federal gov- ernment in 2009 adopted an amnesty programme that offered the fighters life sustaining opportunities for dropping their guns. The policy was imple- mented in two phases: 1) the militants drop their guns and without any nego- tiation or legal framework for admittance of specific guilt get automatic am- nesty and 2) those granted amnesty get rehabilitated and reintegrated into the society. This paper is on how different stakeholders in the Niger Delta en- gaged with the initiative. The paper focuses on five major stakeholders: the federal government which owned the amnesty programme; the Niger Delta Governors who were required to co-facilitate the weapons recovery in their respective states; the warlords under which the Niger Delta militant youths were organized; the political godfathers in the Niger Delta with whom many of the militant groups had working relationship and; the community leaders into whose communities the ex-militants would return into. In the absence of any legal framework for their working relationship, each of the stakeholders acted so selfishly that the amnesty programme today lacks sustainability. While the federal government used the policy to relatively increase Nigeria's oil output, the others manipulated the process to oil their interests in winning the 2011 elections with the militants as key stakeholders. The amnesty programme divided the militants around selfish interests. Militancy is back to the region but not coordinated because the militants are now divided. Keywords Niger Delta, Oil, Militants, Amnesty Policy, Nigeria DOI: 10.4236/blr.2019.104037 Jul. 30, 2019 656 Beijing Law Review

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most