About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

93 Phil. L.J. 709 (2020)
Treaty Termination and the Faults of Philippine Formalism

handle is hein.journals/philplj93 and id is 740 raw text is: 








            TREATY TERMINATION AND THE FAULTS
                    OF  PHILIPPINE FORMALISM*

                           RaphaelA.  Pangalangan


                                 ABSTRACT

        The  1987 Constitution expressly requires Senate approval for
        a treaty to become valid and effective but is silent on treaty
        withdrawal.  President Rodrigo  Duterte  has seized upon  the
        textual gap to withdraw the country  from the Visiting Forces
        Agreement   with the United States of America, without Senate
        approval. On  March   20, 2020, the Senate majority bloc, for
        the first time in history, opposed Dutertian rule and argued
        that because the Constitution requires Senate concurrence for
        treaty conclusion, senatorial imprimatur is likewise needed for
        treaty termination. Neither of these views  finds its place in
        Philippine constitutional order. But while their ends conflict,
        the error is shared: an overreliance on legal text. On one hand,
        the Senate  rightfully invokes the separation of powers,  yet
        unduly  limits that constitutional principle to constitutional
        provisions. On  the other hand, the President ignores how the
        gray in-betweens  of black letter law have long been filled by
        an unwritten yet time-honored  principle. This paper provides
        a third approach. By  shifting the focus from the written text
        to  the unwritten  tenet, the paper  defines the  limits to a
        presidential treaty power  free from the faults of Philippine
        formalism.


        Cite as Raphael Pangalangan, Treaty Termination and the Faults of Philippine Formalism,
93 PHIL L.J. 709, [page cited] (2020). The article was developed from the author's news column
with the Philippine Daily Inquirer. Mishearng Constitutional Silence , PHIL. DAILY INQUIRER, May
2, 2020, available at https://opinion.inquirer.net/130834/mishearing-constitutional-silence.
        ** Member of the Philippine Bar; Assistant Professor and Associate Dean, Jindal
Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University; LL.M., University of Cambridge (2020);
M.St. in International Human Rights Law, with Distinction, University of Oxford (2019);
Grad.D. in Advanced Studies on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, American University
(2017);J.D., University of the Philippines (2016); B.A. Philosophy, cum laude, University of the
Philippines (2012). Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect
the official policy or position of any other agency, organization, employer, or company.


709

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most