About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

66 Emory L.J. 1175 (2016-2017)
The Threat of Expulsion as Unacceptable Coercion: Title IX, Due Process, and Coerced Confessions

handle is hein.journals/emlj66 and id is 1206 raw text is: 










      THE   THREAT OF EXPULSION AS UNACCEPTABLE
           COERCION: TITLE IX, DUE PROCESS, AND
                     COERCED CONFESSIONS

                               ABSTRACT

    The nation's recent focus on the prevalence of sexual assault has rightfully
prompted  colleges and universities to take a second look at their sexual assault
policies. Bringing justice to those who have committed sexual assault, and
violated schools' codes of conduct, is worthy. However, one concern is that the
pendulum  has swung too far to the left. Schools have instituted stricter policies
without considering the due process rights of the accused Problematically, the
statements made by the accused, under limited due process safeguards, can be
used in criminal proceedings. This Comment argues that it is unconstitutional
to admit in a state criminal proceeding statements that were made by students
accused ofsexual assault in a college disciplinary hearing. Specifically, it posits
that such statements can be considered coerced confessions in violation of due
process.

    This Comment pays particular attention to the lack ofsafeguards present in
the college disciplinary process for adjudicating sexual misconduct. Pressure
from the Obama  Administration for colleges and universities to transform their
sexual assault response procedures ushered in sweeping changes that paid little
attention to the accused student's due process rights. This approach to college
sexual misconduct policies, while valuable for victim protection purposes, is
troublesome when  the accused student is facing, or will later face, criminal
charges. This Comment  argues  that the threat of expulsion used by college
officials to elicit statements from an accused student is coercion that becomes
unconstitutional when a prosecutor seeks to admit the statements into evidence
in a criminal case.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most