About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

49 Ariz. St. L.J. 961 (2017)
Federalism as a Constitutional Concept

handle is hein.journals/arzjl49 and id is 1001 raw text is: 




FEDERALISM AS A CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPT

Richard H. Fallon, Jr.*


                               INTRODUCTION
   Debates about constitutional federalism-by which I roughly mean the
division of powers and responsibilities between the national and state
governments'-abound.2      Participants typically   cast such    debates   as
constitutional in character. Nearly invariably, however, policy concerns exert
a dominating influence, either on the surface or just beneath it. More often
than not, proponents offer federalism-based arguments on behalf of
conclusions that they value for policy-based reasons. Reciprocally,
champions of particular theories of constitutional federalism typically argue
that their visions would yield better outcomes-as measured along some
dimension-than would any other understanding of the Constitution's
structure.
   In an effort to chart some dimensions of the relationship between
federalism-based arguments and more overtly normative or policy-based
arguments, I pursue three lines of inquiry in this Essay.
   First, is there such a thing as a constitutional concept of federalism? On
the one hand, the Constitution nowhere uses the term federalism. On the
other hand, the Constitution includes a number of provisions bearing on the
respective powers and prerogatives of the federal and state governments.
Under these circumstances, my first concern is to clarify what it would mean
to describe federalism as a constitutional concept such that we could
plausibly ascribe a theory of federalism to the Constitution itself, rather than


   * Story Professor of Law, Harvard Law School. I am grateful to Max Schulman for invaluable
research assistance and to participants in the Classical Liberal Institute's Conference on
Federalism, especially including Richard Epstein, Daniel Francis, Michael Greve, Tom Merrell,
and Ernie Young.
   1.   An additional, horizontal dimension of constitutional federalism involves states'
prerogatives and responsibilities relative to other states. See, e.g., Allan Erbsen, Horizontal
Federalism, 93 MINN. L. REV. 493, 494 (2008); Heather K. Gerken & Ari Holtzblatt, The Political
Safeguards of Horizontal Federalism, 113 MICH. L. REV. 57, 59 (2014); Gillian E. Metzger,
Congress, Article IV, and Interstate Relations, 120 HARV. L. REV. 1468, 1470 71 (2007).
   2.   For a lucid discussion of the values associated with federalism and of surrounding
debates and controversies, see DAVID L. SHAPIRO, FEDERALISM: A DIALOGUE (1995). On the
historical origins of constitutional federalism, see ALISON L. LACROIX, THE IDEOLOGICAL
ORIGINS OF AMERICAN FEDERALISM (2010).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most