About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

84 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 881 (2009)
Cruelty, Prison Conditions, and the Eighth Amendment

handle is hein.journals/nylr84 and id is 889 raw text is: NEW YORK UNIVERSITY
LAW REVIEW

VOLUME 84                     OCTOBER 2009                        NUMBER 4
ARTICLES
CRUELTY, PRISON CONDITIONS, AND THE
EIGHTH AMENDMENT
SHARON DOLOVICH*
The Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, but its normative
force derives chiefly from its use of the word cruel. For this prohibition to be
meaningful in a society where incarceration is the primary mode of criminal pun-
ishment, it is necessary to determine when prison conditions are cruel. Yet the
Supreme Court has thus far avoided this question, instead holding in Farmer v.
Brennan that unless some prison official actually knew of and disregarded a sub-
stantial risk of serious harm to prisoners, prison conditions are not punishment
within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment. Farmer's reasoning, however, does
not withstand scrutiny. As this Article shows, all state-created prison conditions
should be understood to constitute punishment for Eighth Amendment purposes.
With this in mind, this Article first addresses the question of when prison conditions
are cruel, by considering as a normative matter what the state is doing when it
incarcerates convicted offenders as punishment and what obligations it thereby
incurs toward its prisoners. This Article then turns to the question of constitutional
implementation and considers what doctrinal standards would best capture this
understanding of cruel conditions.
At the heart of the argument is the recognition that the state, when it puts people in
prison, places them in potentially dangerous conditions while depriving them of the
capacity to provide for their own care and protection. For this reason, the state has
an affirmative obligation to protect prisoners from serious physical and psycholog-
ical harm. This obligation, which amounts to an ongoing duty to provide for pris-
* Copyright © 2009 by Sharon Dolovich, Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law. For
helpful comments, I thank Rick Abel, Rachel Barkow, David Dolinko, Ingrid Eagly,
Richard Fallon, Robert Goldstein, Mark Greenberg, Lani Guinier, Youngjae Lee, Daryl
Levinson, Martha Minow, Jonathan Masur, Margo Schlanger, Joanna Schwartz, Anne
Simon, Carol Steiker, workshop participants at Chicago, Georgetown, Harvard, and
UCLA, and the students in my Spring 2008 Eighth Amendment seminar at Harvard Law
School. Thanks also to Dean Michael Schill for his generous support of this project and to
Jacob Howard, Eli Tomar, Jordan Woods, and Katie Wozencroft for outstanding research
assistance.
881

Reprinted with permission of New York University School of Law

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most