About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

38 Md. L. Rev. 673 (1978-1979)
David Hoffman and the Shaping of a Republican Legal Culture

handle is hein.journals/mllr38 and id is 685 raw text is: 



       DAVID HOFFMAN AND THE SHAPING OF A
              REPUBLICAN LEGAL CULTURE*
                    MAXWELL BLOOMFIELD**

    In recent years scholars have paid increasing attention to the
concept of republicanism as a measure of cultural change in
America during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.
To the Revolutionary generation republicanism connoted most
obviously a representative form of government, based upon popular
sovereignty and limited in its powers by a written constitution. But
republican ideology encompassed far more than the restructuring of
political institutions. It called for a regenerated society as well, in
which men should be encouraged to pursue their individual destinies
with a minimum of interference from public authorities. Civic
morality and self-determination were closely linked in republican
thought, and the theme of a virtuous and productive citizenry
permeated much of the literature and art of the new nation.'
    American   law   during  the postrevolutionary   decades also
developed within a framework of republican principles. The idea of
popular sovereignty, as legal historian Morton Horwitz has shown,
led many judges to regard themselves less as custodians of a body of
timeless precepts than as the creative manipulators of precedents
whose legitimacy depended upon popular consent.2 In such areas of
private law as contracts, torts, and property law, these judicial
instrumentalists overthrew the precommercial and antidevelopmen-
tal doctrines of an eighteenth-century squirearchy to promote the
interests of enterprising merchants and bankers.3 A similar
movement from status to contract - from corporatism to individual-
ism - occurred in public law, although in that field judges continued
to insist that they were merely the passive expounders of preexisting
legal rules. For example, the Marshall Court's innovative use of the
    * ©National Archives & Records Div., Gen. Serv. Admin. Reprinted by
permission. This article was presented at the National Archives 1978 Conference and
is to be published in a volume of the proceedings, The Law and American Society:
New Historical Perspectives and Resources.
    ** Professor of History and Chairman of Dep't of History, The Catholic
 University of America. B.A. 1952, Rice University; LL.B. 1957, Harvard University;
 Ph.D. 1962, Tulane University.
     1. See generally N. HARRIS, THE ARTIST IN AMERICAN SOCIETY (1966); H. M.
 JONES, 0 STRANGE NEW WORLD; AMERICAN CULTURE: THE FORMATIVE YEARS (1964);
 G. WOOD, THE CREATION OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC, 1776-1787 (1969); Shalhope,
 Toward a Republican Synthesis: The Emergence of an Understanding of Republican-
 ism in American Historiography, 29 WM. & MARY Q. 49 (1972).
     2. M. HORWITZ, THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN LAW, 1780-1860, at 1-30
 (1977).
     3. Id. at 253-54.


(673)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most