About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

110 Cal. L. Rev. 1157 (2022)
The Pennhurst Doctrines and the Lost Disability History of the "New Federalism"

handle is hein.journals/calr110 and id is 1184 raw text is: The Pennhurst Doctrines and the Lost
Disability History of the New
Federalism
Karen M. Tani*
This Article reconstructs the litigation over an infamous
institution for people with disabilities-Pennhurst State School &
Hospital-and      demonstrates     that    litigation's  powerful    and
underappreciated significance for American lfe and law. It is a tale of
two legacies. In U.S. disability history, Halderman v. Pennhurst State
School & Hospital is a celebrated case. The 1977 trial court decision
recognized a constitutional right to habilitation and ordered the
complete closure of an overcrowded, dehumanizing facility. For
people concerned with present-day mass incarceration, the case
retains relevance as an example of court-ordered abolition.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38P26Q46M
Copyright © 2022 Karen M. Tani
*  JD, Ph.D. (History); Seaman Family University Professor, University of Pennsylvania. This
article benefited from exchanges with Penelope Boyd, Andrew Bradt, Jessica Bulman-Pozen, Stephen
Burbank, Felipe Cole, Jeff Cooper, Robert Dinerstein, Doron Dorfman, Dennis Downey, Katie Eyer,
David Ferleger, Steve Gold, Joe Goldberg, Sally Gordon, Charles Halpern, Jasmine Harris, Frank Laski,
Matthew Lassiter, Sophia Lee, Serena Mayeri, Joy Milligan, Bob Nelkin, William Novak, Arthur
Peabody, James Pfander, Judith Resnik, Stephen Ross, David Rudovsky, Margo Schlanger, Rebecca
Scott, Miriam Seifter, Mehgan Sidhu, Lilith Siegel, Nathan Stenberg, and Amanda Tyler, as well as
from workshop opportunities at Berkeley Law, the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University,
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, Penn State Law, the Temple Beasley School of Law, the
University of Georgia School of Law, the University of Michigan, and the University of Pennsylvania.
Sarah Best, Kara Gordon, Janice Jiang, Paul Sindberg, and Amanda Smith provided exceptional
research assistance. Patrick Kerwin and Paul Riermaier offered vital help with archival sources. Incisive
editorial suggestions from the editors of the California Law Review improved this article immeasurably.
Rabia Belt inspired this work, through years of calling for attention to disability legal history. All errors
and oversights are my own.

1157

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most