About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

104 Calif. L. Rev. 979 (2016)
The Racial Politics of Protection: A Critical Race Examination of Police Militarization

handle is hein.journals/calr104 and id is 1011 raw text is: The Racial Politics of Protection: A Critical Race Examination of Police Militarization Fanna Gamal* ABSTRACT Across the country, police departments are using aggressive, military-style tactics and weapons to enforce the law. More recently, the state of police militarization displayed in cities like Ferguson and Baltimore raises deep questions about the ethics of paramilitary policing and its consequences for minority citizenship and inclusion. This Note examines police militarization as the result of concerted political decisions that often trade on racial fear and anxiety. Beginning in the Reconstruction Era and continuing through to racial uprisings in the 1960s, the War on Drugs, and present movements for police accountability and racial justice, this Note argues that police militarization is, and has always been, a deeply racialized issue. Specifically, the trend ofpolice militarization can be viewed as a race-making process-that is, patterns of police militarization have constructed and reinforced race and racial hierarchies in America. The racial politics of protection refers to a process ofpolice militarization that allows the State to construct race by selectively assembling two groupings-those who will be marginalized through heightened surveillance and control and those who will be advantaged by their access to state protection. Ultimately, this Note stresses a more nuanced conversation about the critical intersections of race, militarization, and policing. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15779/Z385P1R Copyright © 2016 California Law Review, Inc. California Law Review, Inc. (CLR) is a California nonprofit corporation. CLR and the authors are solely responsible for the content of their publications. * J.D., University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, 2016; B.A. Tufts University, 2010. Special thanks to Professor Ian Haney L6pez, Asad Rahim, Evelyn Rangel-Medina, Nabanita Pal, and the editors and members of the California Law Review. Thanks also to the members of the Berkeley Law Critical Race Theory seminar and the Racial Justice Writing Workshop for their valuable feedback. Finally, I am grateful for my friends and family, particularly Kyle Halle-Erby, for their love and support. 979

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most