About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

13 Med. & L. 307 (1994)
DNA Fingerprinting and the Substantive Law

handle is hein.journals/mlv13 and id is 311 raw text is: 






Med Law (1994) 13:307-321                           Medicine
                                                      and Law
                                                    CICML 1994
Law


DNA Fingerprinting and the Substantive

Law


Divya Singh
Advocate of the Supreme Court of South Africa, Lecturer, Department
of Private Law, University of Durban-Westville, Durban, South Africa

      Abstract The ability to analyse human DNA has the potential to rev-
      olutionize legal proceedings - both civil and criminal - especially those
      which turn on biological or genetic evidence. Examining the positive
      and negative aspects of DNA fingerprinting, it would appear that the
      benefits certainly outweigh any disadvantages. In paternity determi-
      nations, DNA fingerprinting renders otiose many of the controversial
      concerns, particularly regarding the determination of legal probability,
      providing as it does unequivocal evidence of blood relationship. Fur-
      thermore, in criminal law, its value is well-documented. The relevant
      legislation is already in place, therefore no further legislation is re-
      quired to enable South African law enforcement agencies to make use
      of the DNA test. The apparently high cost may, however, frustrate its
      general application to the civil law but with the assistance of the state
      and law societies, the envisaged problem could be alleviated. To date
      no other forensic tests rival the accuracy of the DNA test.

1     PRIVATE LAW AND DNA FINGERPRINTING
1 1 Introduction
      In Ex Parte Emmerson' the court (per Schutz J) granted an order
         '[d]irecting and authorising Dr Lane, ... to conduct appropriate DNA
      fingerprinting tests in order to determine the paternity of the unborn
      child'.2
      For persons with an interest, vested or purely academic, in medical
law, this decision was received with a modicum of real, though constrained,
anticipation. It was the first case in which DNA fingerprinting was ordered
by a South African court.3 The facts were very simple: The applicant was
seven and a half months pregnant when the man, whom she alleged to be
the biological father of her unborn child, was killed in a motor accident. The
mother brought an urgent application to court for an order authorizing and
directing the release of skin and/or blood and/or muscle samples of the de-
ceased by the officer in charge of the mortuary, where the body of the de-
ceased was being kept, to a doctor employed by the South African Institute
of Medical Research. The application also contained a request for an order
to be granted authorizing the doctor to perform certain tests, namely ap-
propriate DNA fingerprinting tests, in order that the paternity of the unborn
child could be ultimately determined.


307

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most