About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

70 Duke L.J. 1321 (2020-2021)
Criminalizing Coercive Control within the Limits of Due Process

handle is hein.journals/duklr70 and id is 1318 raw text is: 










      CRIMINALIZING COERCIVE CONTROL
      WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DUE PROCESS

                           ERIN SHELEYT

                             ABSTRACT
     The sociological literature on domestic abuse shows that it is more
complex   than a  series of physical assaults. Abusers use coercive
control  to subjugate  their partners  through  a  web   of threats,
humiliation, isolation, and demands. The presence of coercive control is
highly predictive of future physical violence and is, in and of itself, also
a violation of the victim's liberty and dignity. In response to these new
understandings   the  United  Kingdom    has   recently criminalized
nonviolent  coercive control, making  it illegal to, on two or more
occasions, cause serious alarm or distress to an intimate partner that
has a substantial effect on their day-to-day activities. Such a vaguely
drafted  criminal statute would  raise insurmountable   due  process
problems  under the U.S. Constitution.
     Should the states wish to address the gravity of the harms of coercive
control, however,   this Article proposes   an  alternative statutory
approach. It argues that a state legislature could combine the due process
limits of traditionally enterprise-related offenses such as fraud and
conspiracy with the goals of domestic abuse prevention to create a new
offense based  upon  the fraud-like nature  of coercively controlling
behavior. It argues that the most useful legal framework for defining
coercive control is similar to that of common   law  fraud, and  that
legislatures should adapt the scienter requirements of fraud to the actus
reus of coercive control. In so doing, this Article also argues that it is
risky  for  legislatures to punish  gender-correlated offenses  with
specialized legal solutions, rather than recognizing the interrelationship
between such offenses and other well-established crimes.


Copyright © 2021 Erin Sheley.
   t  Associate Professor, California Western School of Law. Many thanks to Caroline
Davidson, James Lindgren, and Jenia Iontcheva Turner for their immensely helpful comments on
earlier drafts of this paper.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most