About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

102 Marq. L. Rev. 949 (2018-2019)
Dying Constitutionalism and the Fourteenth Amendment

handle is hein.journals/marqlr102 and id is 975 raw text is: 









    DYING CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE
             FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT

                           ERNEST A. YOUNG*


I.THE FOURTEENTH   AMENDMENT'S   LOST  YEARS....           .................952
II.THE LIVING CONSTITUTIONALIST  CASE  FOR RE-ENTRENCHED   RACIAL
      OPPRESSION          ................................................ 962
III.THE LESSONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL   FAILURE .......................975

    My marching  orders from Dean Kearney for this year's Boden Lecture are
to  commemorate   the  sesquicentennial of the Constitution's Fourteenth
Amendment,   which was ratified in 1868. This ought to be a much easier task
now  than it would have been at the demisesquicentennial-halfway between
1868 and today-because  I think it's fair to say that the Fourteenth Amendment
largelyfailed to live up to its promise during the first half of its existence. At
that halfway mark in 1943, African Americans, who were supposed to be the
amendment's  primary beneficiaries, suffered under a pervasively authoritarian
Jim Crow  regime in the South and faced rampant discrimination and hostility
in the North. The Supreme Court had begun to chip away at Jim Crow in a few
isolated decisions, but these hadn't made much practical difference. Fourteenth
Amendment   demisesquicentennialists-if there were any-would   have had
very little to cheer about in 1943.
    We  live in a very different constitutional world today, with a robust and
vital Fourteenth Amendment at its center. And so it would be easy to tell you
a heartwarming story about the amendment's second act as one of the great
comeback  sagas in American history. But failures are often more interesting
than successes. I want to focus on the Fourteenth Amendment's bad years,
because I think that they can tell us something important about constitutional
theory.


* Alston & Bird Professor, Duke Law School. This essay is a lightly edited version of the Robert
F. Boden Lecture presented at Marquette Law School on September 20, 2018. 1 am grateful to Dean
Joseph Kearney for his invitation and wonderful hospitality during my visit to Milwaukee, to my friend
David Strauss for his commentary, and to Joseph Blocher, Erin Blondel, James Boyle, Guy Charles,
Thavolia Glymph, Craig Goldblatt, Sean Griffith, Jed Purdy, and Richard Squire for comments on the
manuscript.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most