About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

24 U. Botswana L.J. 27 (2017)
The Myth of Devolution in Zimbabwe: The Reality Post - May 2013

handle is hein.journals/unbotslj24 and id is 25 raw text is: 


27


  The Myth   of Devolution in Zimbabwe:   The Reality Post - May  2013

              Mkhululi  Nyathi* and  Matshobana   Ncube**

ABSTRACT

The  2013  Constitution of Zimbabwe   provides for a  devolved system  of
government,   comprising  national, provincial/ metropolitan  and   local
governments.  On the face of it, this is a departure from the Independence
Constitution which  did not provide for devolution of power  This paper,
however, seeks  to demonstrate that there is in fact no marked difference
between the currentframework  and the pre-2013 constitutional dispensation.
Weak  and unsatisfactory legal and constitutional provisions on governance
at national, provincial and local government levels, combined with the anti-
devolution stance of  the current ZANU-PF   government,   have conspired
to make  devolution of power nothing but a mirage. It is contended that a
truly devolved system of governance in Zimbabwe  may  be realized through
constitutional amendments   establishing  realistic sub-national tiers of
governments  that are democratically legitimate and have clear law making
and implementation powers  of their own.

1.      INTRODUCTION

After three post-independence attempts at wholesale constitutional reform,
Zimbabwe   was finally able to adopt a new constitution after the May 2013
referendum. One of the results of the 2013 constitutional referendum was the
adoption of a 'devolved' framework  of government.  However,  devolution
in Zimbabwe  is more a matter of appearance than reality. Those that fought
hard for a devolved system of government now  face the sad reality that their
fight was all but in vain.' For all intents and purposes, the pre May 2013
centralised system of government   remains in place with  slight cosmetic
changes.
        In addition to  the challenge of  a thin constitutional basis for
*   LLB (UZ), LLM (WITS), LLD (UP), Pretoria, South Africa, mkhululi.nvathi(amail.com
** LLB (UZ), LLM (MSU).
1  Empirical evidence gathered during the public consultative phase of the constitution making process
   indicates that seven out of ten provinces were in favour of devolution. See the National Statistical
   Report, Version 2, presented at the Second All Stakeholders Conference in October 2012 in Harare;
   pp.268-276.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most