About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

24 Phil. L.J. 341 (1949)
Administrative Agencies and Non-Delegation of Legislative Power

handle is hein.journals/philplj24 and id is 343 raw text is: PHILIPPINE                    LAW     JOURNAL
Vol. XXIV                     December, 1949                          No. 6
Administrative Agencies and Non-
Delegation of Legislative Power
By Enrique M. Fernando *
I. Need For Administrative Agencies and Non-Delegation-
The increasing complexity of industrial and social problems and the
growing recognition of the role of the Government in promoting social
and economic rights for all call for the creation of more administrative
agencies.' For Congress does not possess either the time or the tech-
nical skill to enact detailed regulations for the carrying out of the poli-
cies laid down. It is a difficult enough task determining its broad out-
lines. To require more would 1e to demand the impossible.2
And yet under the constitutional scheme in the Philippines as well
as in the United States, legislation creating such administrative agencies
might be assailed on the ground that there has been an unconstitutional
or improper delegation of legislative power. For the rule is well settled
both under Philippine and American adjudications that the power to
make laws is vested in Congress and Congress solely, and that it cannot
escape its duties qnd responsibilities by delegating power to any other
body or authority.' It is also equally well settled that the authority to
promulgate rules and regulations, in itself analogous to the law-making
function, may be delegated under certain circumstances to implement
the legislation as enacted and to effectuate its policies.4 The latter may
he characterized as the administrative authority to issue regulations, an
authority the administrative agencies may exercise. The question then
* Associate Professor, U.P. College of Law, LI.B., U.P., LI.M. (Yale)
I Panqasinan Transportation v. Public Service Commission, 40 0. G. 8th Sup. 57; Laski,
H., The Growth of Administrative Discretion in 4 Selected Essays on Constitutional Law
219; Landis, J., The Administrative Process, pp. 7-46.
2Cf. Pangasinan Transportation v. Public Service Commission, 40 D.G., 8th Sup.
57; Carr, C., Delegated Legislation, Jaffe, L., An Essay on Delegation of Legislative Power.
47 Col. Law, Rev. 359, at 361; Laski. H., op. cit.; Landis, J., op. cit.
3Componia v. Board, 34 Phil. 136; United States v. Ang Tang Ho, 43 Phil. I; People
v. Yera, 37 0. G. 164: Field v. Clark, 143 U. S. 649: Panama Ref. Co v. Ryan, 293 U. S.
388; Schecfer Poultry Corporation v. United States, 295 U. S. 495.
4 Rubi v. Provincial Board, 39 Phil. 660; People v. Yera, 37 0. G. 164; Panama Ref. Co.
v. Ryan, 293 U. S. 388; Cincinnati R. Co. v. Clinton County Com., I Ohio State 77.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most