About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2 Fed. Prisons J. 41 (1991-1992)
Conditions of Confinement Suits

handle is hein.journals/fedprsj2 and id is 139 raw text is: 
Summer 1991                                                                                                  41





             Conditions of Confinement Suits

                          What has the Bureau of Prisons learned?



 Scott Styles

 For more than 60 years the Federal      Cai-,
 Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has succeeded                         OF THE       U   RiU          Ayl
 in avoiding major judicial intervention to       (   .2 /        ,       .
 correct conditions of confinement in its              /'/asd.AeM,,[ 'g2       Q/7,
 facilities. In contrast to many State       .   4.i     C.   '   '
 correctional systems, the BOP has                    a'j    ,,
 effectively implemented policies and
 procedures to address conditions of,.,,,
 confinement that could potentially lead to  o A
 serious litigation. These measures have            RRE&OL
 made it difficult for inmates to prove that  .11,7 t..
 conditions of confinement in Bureau            -      .
 facilities are unconstitutional.

 As the Bureau enters a new decade,                            M ,
 however, and with no abatement in the
 increase of the inmate population in  ...,     .--. ---
 sight, common sense recommends an
 increase in vigilance over conditions in   77 d.
 BOP facilities. If the Bureau cannot
 remain one step ahead of litigation, then
 it will jeopardize what it takes pride in
 maintaining: credible, independent
 management. Reviewing State facilities'
 experiences with conditions of confine-
 ment suits, and those of the Bureau, can
 provide insight into how the Bureau
 might preserve its reputation and avoid
judicial intervention.

History of judicial
intervention
Before the 1960's, courts did not view it
as their province to intervene in the
internal affairs of America's prisons.
Inmates whose grievances were not
settled by their wardens could not expect
sympathy from the courts. As recently as
1954, courts commonly held in favor of
administrators, as the Federal circuit
court did in Banning v. Looney: [judges
do not have] the power to supervise

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most