About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

33 San Diego L. Rev. 1127 (1996)
Securities Fraud Prosecutions: Still Viable under California Securities Law after Simon

handle is hein.journals/sanlr33 and id is 1139 raw text is: Securities Fraud Prosecutions:
Still Viable Under California Securities
Law After Simon?*
GEORGE A. CRAWFORD, NATALIE C. ROBERTS, AND
SHAWN J. NELSON*
In January 1995, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion that
had the impact of a bombshell on California securities fraud prosecu-
tions. In People v. Simon, California's Supreme Court overturned a
Lutheran minister's criminal conviction for securities fraud.' The court
based its decision on jury instructions it considered inappropriate. The
instructions stated that neither guilty knowledge nor criminal intent
* On April 3, 1996, the Honorable John G. Davies of the United States District
Court of the Central District of California granted a writ of habeas corpus to Charles H.
Keating, Jr., effectively overturning his conviction for violations of Corporations Code
section 25401. Keating v. Hood, 922 F. Supp. 1482 (1996). Applying Simon to the
instructions given the Keating jury, Judge Davies found a denial of due process in the
failure to determine the appropriate intent required to convict the defendant as either a
direct perpetrator or an aider and abettor. Id. at 1486, 1493.
* George A. Crawford and Natalie C. Roberts are lawyers with the Enforcement
Division of the California Department of Corporations. During preparation of this
article, Shawn J. Nelson served as an intern with the Department of Corporations and
was in his second year at Loyola Law School.
The opinions stated herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the
California Commissioner or the Department of Corporations.
Appreciation is also expressed for the review and suggestions of Mr. Richard
Lowenstein, Esq. of the Major Frauds Division for the Los Angeles County District
Attorney's Office.
1. 9 Cal. 4th 493, 886 P.2d 1271, 37 Cal. Rptr. 2d 278 (1995). Noting that
different jury instructions could have led to a finding that there had been a preexisting
relationship sufficient to warrant an exemption, the court also overturned Simon's
conviction for the sale of unqualified securities.

1127

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most