About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

31 Baylor L. Rev. 243 (1979)
Attempted Murder: Should Specific Intent to Kill Be Required

handle is hein.journals/baylr31 and id is 271 raw text is: NOTES

ATTEMPTED MURDER: SHOULD SPECIFIC INTENT To KILL BE RE-
QUIRED?-The Texas Legislature adopted a general criminal at-
tempt statute in 1973.' That provision prohibits an attempt to com-
mit any offense specified in the Penal Code. Since its adoption, some
confusion has arisen concerning the elements of the offense of at-
tempted murder.2 The Court of Criminal Appeals held in Baldwin v.
State' that specific intent to kill need not be shown to obtain a con-
viction for attempted murder. That decision could potentially result
in the conviction and sentencing of individuals under an inappropri-
ate statutory offense. This article will examine Baldwin by review-
ing the relevant statutory language and the construction of similar
statutes in other jurisdictions.
I. REQUISITE INTENT
The historical offense of assault with intent to murder is generally
considered to be the predecessor of attempted murder.' The Texas
Legislature first enacted an assault with intent to murder statute in
1857.1 Between 1882 and 1974, one could not be convicted of assault
with intent to murder absent proof of intent to kill the victim.6 A
'TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 15.01 (Vernon Supp. 1978-1979) which provides in rele-
vant part: (a) A person commits an offense if, with specific intent to commit an of-
fense, he does an act amounting to more than mere preparation that tends but fails
to effect the commission of the offense intended. (Emphasis added).
The offense of attempted murder derives from the combination of TEX. PENAL
CODE ANN. §§ 15.01 and 19.02 (Vernon 1974), the latter of which provides in relevant
part:
A person commits an offense if he:
(1) intentionally or knowingly causes the death of an individual;
(2) intends to cause serious bodily injury and commits an act clearly danger-
ous to human life that causes the death of an individual; or
(3) commits or attempts to commit a felony, other than voluntary or involun-
tary manslaughter, and in the course of and in furtherance of the commission
or attempt, or in immediate flight from the commission or attempt, he com-
mits or attempts to commit an act clearly dangerous to human life that
causes the death of an individual.
id. at (a).
1538 S.W.2d 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976).
'See generally 40 C.J.S. Homicide § 68 (1944); and 40 AM. JUR. 2d Homicide § 566
(1968).
'*TEX. PENAL CODE art. 493 (1857).
'See, e.g., White v. State, 13 Tex. Ct. App. 259 (1882); Hooper v. State, 29 Tex. Ct.
App. 614, 16 S.W. 655 (1891); Walters v. State, 37 Tex. Crim. 388, 35 S.W. 652
(1896); Brewer v. State, 68 Tex. Crim. 483, 153 S.W. 622 (1913); Yeager v. State, 109
Tex. Crim 213, 3 S.W.2d 808 (1928); Jessie v. State, 126 Tex. Crim. 250, 70 S.W.2d
743 (1934); Ammann v. State, 145 Tex. Crim. 34, 165 S.W.2d 744 (1942); King v.
State, 153 Tex. Crim. 422, 220 S.W.2d 647 (1949); Windham v. State, 162 Tex. Crim.
620, 288 S.W.2d 90 (1956); Hall v. State, 418 S.W.2d 810 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967); Bell
v. State, 501 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1973). In 1882, the Court of Criminal Ap-
peals first required a specific intent to kill for assault with intent to murder in White

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most