About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

64 Emory L.J. 477 (2014-2015)
Is the Class Action Really Dead - Is That Good or Bad for Class Members

handle is hein.journals/emlj64 and id is 490 raw text is: IS THE CLASS ACTION REALLY DEAD? IS THAT GOOD OR BAD FOR CLASS MEMBERS? Georgene Vairo* ABSTRACT Recent Supreme Court decisions have tightened up the standards for obtaining class certification and virtually eliminate class arbitration as well. However, while the Court has made it more difficult for plaintiffs attorneys to use class resolution of claims as a prosecutorial tool, the lower federal courts appear to relax certification standards when the parties seek to certify a settlement class. Because of the preclusive power of a class action, which binds all class members who do not opt out, the class action remains a potent settlement tool. The 2014 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium panel that served as the foundation for this paper, Binding the Future: Global Settlements and the Death of Representative Litigation, asked, however, whether class settlements are bad for class members. This Article begins by analyzing the Supreme Court's certification decisions and agrees with most commentators that although class actions are not dead, the device's utility as a prosecution tool has been compromised. However, the Article then shows that certification of class actions for settlement purposes is alive and well. Finally, the Article identifies possible alternatives to the use of class actions. Although much attention has been (and should be) directed at the fairness ofproposed settlements, the Article suggests that it is fortunate that the lower federal courts are not applying class certification standards as stringently in the class settlement context. This is because, despite all the problems inherent in class action practice, class actions remain the best of a range of options for protecting the rights of class members, particularly in low-value claim cases. . David P. Leonard Professor of Law, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles. I wish to thank the Emory Law Journal for inviting me to participate in the 2014 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium, and for the help of its editors in the preparation of this Article. I also want to thank Professor Rich Freer for being such a supportive friend and colleague over the decades we have shared in academia. He has always pushed me to be the best that I can be.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most