About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

30 Cardozo L. Rev. 949 (2008-2009)
Toward Ethical Plea Bargaining

handle is hein.journals/cdozo30 and id is 957 raw text is: TOWARD ETHICAL PLEA BARGAINING

Erica Hashimoto*
Defendants in criminal cases are overwhelmingly more likely to
plead guilty than to go to trial. Presumably, at least a part of the reason
that most of them do so is that it is in their interest to plead guilty, i.e.,
they will receive a more favorable outcome if they plead guilty than if
they go to trial. The extent to which pleas reflect fair or rational
compromises in practice, however, depends upon a variety of factors,
including the amount of information each of the parties has about the
case. Some level of informational symmetry therefore is critical to the
plea process.    Unfortunately, defendants currently   have limited
constitutional rights to pre-plea discovery, and prosecutors pre-plea
have every incentive to conceal information that might be helpful to
defendants. Further compounding the problem, prosecutors in some
jurisdictions require as a condition of all pleas that defendants waive
any rights they may have to pre-plea disclosures from the government.
Because the failure to disclose impeachment or exculpatory information
seriously undermines the accuracy and just operation of the plea
process, the ethical rules governing prosecutors should be interpreted to
require pre-plea disclosure of exculpatory information and impeachment
information. While as a practical matter it ultimately would be up to
defense counsel to guarantee that prosecutors comply with such an
ethical obligation, these rules at the very least would give defense
counsel a tool to obtain helpful information so that they can more
accurately assess whether pleading guilty is in a client's best interest.
I. THE IMPORTANCE OF PRE-PLEA DISCLOSURE OF EXCULPATORY AND
IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE
The vast majority of criminal cases in this country are resolved
through guilty pleas. In state courts, criminal defendants charged with
* Associate Professor, University of Georgia School of Law, A.B. Harvard College, J.D.
Georgetown University Law Center. I appreciate the helpful comments of the symposium
participants as well as those of Kevin McMunigal and Ellen Yaroshefsky. I also appreciate the
research assistance provided by Benn Wilson (UGA '09).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most