About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

69 Ark. L. Rev. 317 (2016-2017)
The Potentially Unamendable State Constitutional Core

handle is hein.journals/arklr69 and id is 339 raw text is: 








        The  Potentially Unamendable State
                  Constitutional Core

                     Lawrence  Friedman-

     One  of  the  first cases my   state  constitutional law
students encounter  is Omaha  National Bank  v. Spire, in which
the Nebraska   Supreme   Court considered   a challenge to an
initiative-created state  constitutional amendment conce-
rning corporate  ownership   of real estate used for farming.'
The   plaintiff argued,   among other things, that the
amendment was itself unconstitutional, to which the court
responded:     No  part  of  the  [state] Constitution...  is
inviolable.  To  hold  to the contrary  would   give absolute
finality to a portion of the Constitution and would thwart the
express  will of the people when   they retained  the right to
amend   their Constitution.2 Further, the court noted  that it
was   not the  judiciary's role  to tell the  voters ... that
although   the  Constitution  states  that the  people   have
reserved  the power   to amend   that Constitution, they  may
only  amend   it in ways that  [the court] determine[s]....3
Thus  the court emphasized   the inherent amendability  of the
state constitution-a   feature  that comes  as  a surprise  to
students  who,  in their course  on the  federal Constitution,
learn that one purpose   of a constitution is to secure certain
values  and  interests from  democratic   abridgement. And
then I point out that no provision  of the U.S. Constitution is


* Professor of Law, New England Law, Boston. I prepared this essay for the
symposium on State Constitutional Change, hosted by the Arkansas Law Review at
the University of Arkansas School of Law in Fayetteville on January 22, 2016. I'm
grateful to Jon Marshfield for the invitation to participate in the symposium; to
Richard Albert, whose scholarship has informed my thinking about state
constitutional amendment; to Bob Williams, who helped me work through the
arguments I explore in this essay; to my colleagues, Elizabeth Bloom, Vic Hansen, and
Jordy Singer, for their comments and suggestions; and to Amanda Palmeira, for her
excellent research assistance.
    1. 389 N.W.2d 269, 271-72 (Neb. 1986).
    2. Id. at 274.
    3. Id. at 278.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most