About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

21 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 635 (2017)
The Effect of Online Technologies on Dispute Resolution System Design: Antecedents, Current Trends, and Future Directions

handle is hein.journals/lewclr21 and id is 667 raw text is: 








     THE   EFFECT OF ONLINE TECHNOLOGIES ON DISPUTE
   RESOLUTION SYSTEM DESIGN: ANTECEDENTS, CURRENT
                TRENDS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

                                    by
                                Ayelet Sela*

     Online dispute resolution (ODR) technologies are now increasingly used
     by courts, administrative agencies, companies and alternative dispute
     resolution (ADR)  organizations to handle  cases in various  legal
     domains. Two  decades have passed since the first ODR systems were
     launched and their impact on access to justice and the delivery of justice
     has evolved to a great extent. This Article offers an overview and
     analysis of these developments. First, it discusses the pragmatic and
     ideological antecedents of ODR: developments in information technology
     and online activity, and the rise of the effective access to justice and
     alternative dispute resolution movements.  Second, it proposes  a
     typological framework for evaluating ODR systems in terms of dispute
     types, resolution methods, settings, technologies, providers, and process
     designs. It then uses the framework to systematically analyze the current
     landscape of ODR,   offering specific examples of ODR systems that
     demonstrate the effects that technology has had on dispute resolution
     process design: procedural transposition, restructuring and novelty. The
     Article closes with a critical discussion of current trends and future
     directions of ODR, including transition from private to public ODR,
     hybrid process designs, crowd-sourced cyberjuries, connecting ODR with
     reputation systems, and data-driven ODR learning systems.


INTRODUCTION              ....................................................... 636
I.     THE ANTECEDENTS OF ODR                ................................. 637
       A.  Growth  in Online Activities and Services     .................. 638
       B.  The Rise of ADR and the Effective Access to justice Movement...... 641
II.    THE  CURRENT   LANDSCAPE   OF ODR    ............     .   ......... 645
       A.  Multidimensional Typological Framework for ODR..................... 646
           1.  Dispute Type, Origin and Domain.      ..............   ..... 648
           2.  Setting and Jurisdictional Forum.........        ...... ...... 648
           3.  ODR  Technology and Service Providers..         ................. 649



     Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, Bar Ilan University Faculty of Law. For
thoughtful comments and helpful conversations that greatly informed this Article, I
wish to thank Deborah Hensler, Mark Kelman, Janet Martinez, Colin Rule, and Orna
Rabinovich-Einy.


635

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most