About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

32 Cornell Int'l L.J. 507 (1999)
The Amnesty Exception to the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court

handle is hein.journals/cintl32 and id is 515 raw text is: The Amnesty Exception to the
Jurisdiction of the International
Criminal Court
Michael P. Scharf*
Introduction
This article examines the paradoxical question of whether the Interna-
tional Criminal Court will require justice at the expense of peace. Notwith-
standing the popular catch phrase of the 1990s - no peace without
justice' - peace and justice are sometimes incompatible goals. To end an
international or internal conflict, negotiations must often be conducted
with the very leaders who were responsible for war crimes and crimes
against humanity. When this is the case, insisting on criminal prosecu-
tions can prolong the conflict, resulting in more death, destruction, and
human suffering.2
Reflecting this reality, during the past several years, Argentina, Cambo-
dia, Chile, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Uruguay, and South Africa have
each granted amnesty to members of the former regime that committed
international crimes within their respective borders as part of a peace
arrangement.3 With respect to four of these countries - Cambodia, E1 Sal-
vador, Haiti, and South Africa - the United Nations pushed for, helped
negotiate, and/or endorsed, the granting of amnesty as a means of restor-
ing peace and democratic government.4
The term amnesty derives from the Greek word amnestia - mean-
* Professor of Law and Director of the Center for International Law and Policy,
New England School of Law; former Attorney-Adviser for U.N. Affairs, U.S. Department
of State; J.D. Duke University School of Law, 1988; A.B. Duke University, 1985.
1. See, e.g. David Rieff, The Precious Triumph of Human Rights, N.Y. TiMEs, Aug. 8,
1999, at 37.
2. As an anonymous government official stated in an oft-quoted article: The quest
for justice for yesterday's victims of atrocities should not be pursued in such a manner
that it makes today's living the dead of tomorrow. Anonymous, Human Rights in Peace
Negotiations, 18 HUM. RTs. Q. 249, 258 (1996). One commentator has concluded that
this anonymous author is Lord David Owen, the Co-Chairman of the Yugoslavia Peace
Talks, see David Forsyth, International Criminal Courts: A Political View, 15 NrERLAN~ s
Q. HUM. RTs. 5, 9 n.11 (1997), but it is more likely from the context of the article that
the author was a member of the U.S. Delegation to the Dayton talks.
3. See Michael P. Scharf, The Letter of the Law: The Scope of the International Legal
Obligation to Prosecute Human Rights Crimes, 59 LAw & CoNTEMP. PROBS. 1, 1 (1996);
Naomi Roht-Arriaza, State Responsibility to Investigate and Prosecute Grave Human Rights
Violations in International Law, 78 CAL. L. REv. 451, 458-61, 484 n.187 (1990).
4. See Scharf, supra note 3, at 1.
32 CORNEnL INT'L LJ. 507 (1999)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most