About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

62 Ariz. L. Rev. 805 (2020)
"Every Rhyme I Write": Rap Music as Evidence in Criminal Trials

handle is hein.journals/arz62 and id is 821 raw text is: EVERY RHYME I WRITE: RAP MUSIC AS EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS Reyna Araibi* In 1991, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld the conviction of Derek Foster, whose prosecution was based in part on rap lyrics he wrote referencing drugs and narcotics trafficking. United States v. Foster ignited a trend across the country in which prosecutors use defendant-authored rap music as evidence at trial. Beginning in the 1970s, Black artists in the United States created rap music as a form of resistance and as a means of expressing uniquely Black identity. This deep connection between rap and race continues to inform how society perceives rap music and its artists. Over the years, social psychologists have observed the distinct prejudicial impact that rap has on the way that people implicitly judge rap artists as violent criminals. These psychologists posit that rap is judged harshly because it is viewed through the lens of racial stereotypes. The relationship between rap and implicit racial bias is particularly concerning in the criminal context in which juries are asked to assess the guilt of a rap artist who is commonly a person of color. This Note is a critical assessment of the use of defendant-authored rap music in criminal trials. It first provides an in-depth study of the history of rap music and its connection to race in the United States. It then examines how rap is used at trial through an analysis of the rules of evidence. Ultimately, it argues that the use of rap music as evidence is unfairly prejudicial. As such, judges should exercise the discretion afforded under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 to exclude rap in the majority of cases because of the serious risk that juries will be improperly influenced by their implicit racial biases, compromising the constitutional guarantee of impartiality and the endeavor to rid the criminal justice system of racial animus. * J.D. Candidate, University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, Class of 2021. This Note is dedicated to the people who use art as a means of resilience and resistance, and to the criminal defense attorneys who represent their clients with creativity, compassion, and commitment. Thank you to Professor Jason Kreag for his thoughtful guidance, the Arizona Law Review for its hard work and attention to detail, my friends for their encouragement, and Andrea Matheson for her mentorship. A special thank you to my parents for their eternal love and support-my father who teaches me faith, strength, and determination; and my mother who inspires my passion for social justice and who shows me every day how to be the attorney and the human being I want to be.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most