About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

16 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J. 551 (2007)
The 2006 Revisions to Japan's Equal Opportunity Employment Law: A Narrow Approach to a Pervasive Problem

handle is hein.journals/pacrimlp16 and id is 557 raw text is: Copyright © 2007 Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association

THE 2006 REVISIONS TO JAPAN'S EQUAL
OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT LAW: A NARROW
APPROACH TO A PERVASIVE PROBLEM
Megan L. Staricht
Abstract:  In  June  2006, Japan    changed  its approach  to  employment
discrimination by amending the Equal Employment Opportunity Law (EEOL). The
change was prompted by increased gender discrimination litigation, domestic economic
pressures relating to the low birth rate, a stagnant economy and declining labor force, and
criticism from the United Nations. The revised law attempts to address several of the
shortcomings of the old law. First, Japan has made the law applicable to all workers
rather than just to women workers. Second, the revisions expand the scope of the law by
including a section on indirect discrimination. Third, the revisions provide greater
protection for workers who take childcare and family leave by prohibiting employers
from effectively denying employees' rights to child care leave.
While these revisions to the EEOL indicate a positive conceptual shift in
employment discrimination law in Japan, they appear to fall short in three areas. First,
the provisions on indirect discrimination are too narrowly drafted. Second, the childcare
leave provisions fail to place an affirmative duty on employers to act. Third, the
enforcement measures are still too weak. To correct these problems, a more general legal
definition of indirect discrimination should be drafted, regulations should be issued to
assist employers in providing more accommodating work environments for parents who
exercise their right to child care leave, and the enforcement provisions of the law should
be strengthened.
This comment traces the development of the EEOL in Japan and highlights the
issues that the old versions of the law did not address. It then discusses the specific
changes in the 2006 revisions, their strengths and shortcomings, and recommends certain
changes.
I.      INTRODUCTION
Setsuko Honma, a Japanese woman and gender-rights litigant,
proclaimed the 2006 Revisions to Japan's Equal Opportunity Employment
Law useless.' She was not alone in her disappointment. Honma was one
of five women who sued her employer, the Kanematsu Corporation, for its
2
discriminatory      dual-track    career system.         The   employees claimed         that
1 The author would like to thank Professors Andrew Pardieck and Veronica Taylor for their
guidance and advice, and the editorial staff of the Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal for their tireless
work and encouragement.   Finally, I would like to thank my husband Kevin for his support and
understanding throughout this process.
Akemi Nakamura, Working Women Still Battle Bias, JAPAN TIMES, Mar. 9, 2006, at $ 2, available
at htt://search.japantimes.co.jp/print/nn20060309fl .html.
The dual-track career system is a practice among many of Japan's larger employers. They
separate their regular, full-time employees into two tracks, a managerial track and a clerical track. Men are
predominantly placed on the managerial track and enjoy better pay and better opportunities for
advancement and promotion. Employers argue the distinction is not made on the basis of gender but on
other characteristics such as educational background, performance on examinations, ability to work long

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most